L

OS ANGELES — Federal regulators are preparing to crack down on scores of clinics across the United States that offer pricey stem cell therapies for conditions ranging from autism to multiple sclerosis to erectile dysfunction without any scientific evidence that they work.

As many as 200 stem cell clinics have cropped up in recent years, peddling injections, facelifts, and treatments for a number of devastating conditions. They have avoided heavy regulation, in part because they use cells extracted from a patient’s own body and because they don’t do much to those cells before reinjecting them.

But the Food and Drug Administration recently issued draft guidelines clarifying that the stem cells used in most clinics are drugs and require a rigorous approval process before they can be used in patients. A public hearing is set for April.

advertisement

The FDA underscored the new approach in a warning letter it sent at the end of December to a network of stem cell clinics in California, New York, and Florida. Regulators advised the owner that he needed FDA licenses and approval to sell and use stem cells, which the agency classified in the letter as biological drugs. Such licenses would require evidence that stem cell treatments are both safe and effective — the sort of proof that takes drug companies many years of clinical trials to obtain, at a cost of millions of dollars.

Anxious patients plan to flood the public hearing, scheduled for April 13 in Silver Spring, Md., and assert their rights to use their own cells as they see fit.

The FDA’s moves come after years of pressure from physicians and researchers who have called for a crackdown on an unproved therapy that they consider dangerous quackery. These critics say there’s no evidence the treatments work — or that some of them even contain stem cells. Yet clinics charge fees ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 per treatment, with some patients reportedly racking up bills over $100,000.

While there haven’t been many reports of serious complications from stem cell therapy, two Florida patients died in recent years after receiving stem cell injections; a California woman developed painful bone fragments in her eyelids after a stem cell facelift; and another patient developed a mucous-secreting growth of nasal tissue in her spine after undergoing stem cell treatment in an attempt to cure her paralysis.

“It’s a huge, unapproved human experiment,” said Paul Knoepfler, a stem cell researcher at the University of California at Davis who tracks for-profit stem cell clinics on his blog “The Niche.”

The FDA did issue a public warning about stem cells in 2012 and has sent a series of warning letters to individual clinics in recent years, mostly involving issues of sterility and disease prevention. In some cases, regulators warned that the processes used by the clinics turned the cells into what the FDA would consider drugs. A handful of clinics targeted by the agency have moved their operations out of the US.

But that’s not the norm: Patients don’t have to travel to Mexico or India to get stem cell therapy, as they would for many other questionable treatments. There are clinics even in rural states like Kansas and Nebraska.

Leigh Turner, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota who has been pressing the FDA for years to crack down on the clinics, said he has been amazed that regulators have allowed the industry to grow so rapidly.

“If it’s not safe and it’s not going to help patients,” Turner said, “it’s just predatory behavior.”

Brushing off charges of ‘quackery’

Dr. Mark Berman has heard such criticism often.

“Doctors say it’s quackery, nonsensical, no better than placebo,” Berman said. “Everyone on the planet thinks I’m a charlatan and we’re just in it for the money.”

An entrepreneurial cosmetic surgeon based here in Beverly Hills, Berman has been providing stem cell treatments since 2010 and cofounded a network of clinics in 2012. He uses liposuction to extract fat from the patient, then spins it in a centrifuge with various enzymes for about a half-hour to separate a host of cells, including stem cells. He says he uses lab tests to verify that stem cells are present.

Dr Mark Berman Stem Cell Clinic
Dr. Mark Berman in his Beverly Hills office. Iris Schneider for STAT

He then injects this “soup,” as he calls it, back into patients. Berman charges $8,900 per treatment (though he sometimes gives free or discounted care to financially strapped patients). He says the injections have been most successful for orthopedic issues, arthritis, and joint pain.

But a website for his Cell Surgical Network, an umbrella for dozens of stem cell clinics nationwide, lists more than two dozen other conditions the physicians are “currently studying,” including Parkinson’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — more commonly called Lou Gehrig’s disease — congestive heart failure, lung disease, glaucoma, and muscular dystrophy.

The website is careful not to promise that the stem cell injections can cure or treat those diseases, and Berman said he makes it clear to all patients that the work is investigative and not FDA-approved.

Berman acknowledges that he has no published studies to back up his treatment. But he says he’s certain it works and is safe. As proof of his confidence, he notes that he used the therapy to successfully treat his wife for hip pain.

He says critics, including pharmaceutical companies and academics, want to profit by patenting stem cells and fear “disruptive technologies” that come from entrepreneurs rather than from their own incremental research.

Berman plans to attend the FDA hearing to argue, as other clinics have, that the injections are not drugs, but simple outpatient surgeries that should not be regulated.

Real promise, vastly overhyped

There are two main types of stem cells. Those derived from embryos can turn into almost any other type of cell in the body. Adult stem cells, specific to certain tissues, are not quite as flexible, but still serve as a kind of internal repair system.

Because of their remarkable regenerative powers, both embryonic and adult stem cells hold the promise of curing a variety of ills. Stem cells extracted from bone marrow have long been used to treat cancer and blood and immune disorders.

At least one published study shows stem cells extracted from fat tissue can speed healing of grafted tissue.

Clinical trial evidence also suggests the cells might speed wound healing, improve heart function, and treat scleroderma, said Dr. Peter Rubin, a stem cell researcher who chairs the department of plastic surgery at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. He is running a clinical trial to test the use of stem cells to repair severe facial wounds in soldiers.

But Rubin says any new treatments based on stem cells are years away.

And there’s no evidence yet that the cells can heal the variety of grave conditions, from stroke to incontinence to lung disease, that the clinics claim to treat — and no proof, other than the word of clinic operators, that they are harvesting the stem cells cleanly, or even harvesting them at all.

“What’s in the syringe? My guess is nothing helpful,” Knoepfler said. “It’s really scary to think there are thousands of people being injected with stuff, and in most cases we don’t know what that stuff is.”

Dr Mark Berman Stem Cell Clinic
Audrey Fianza, a certified surgical technician, holds a syringe during a stem cell treatment at Berman’s office. Iris Schneider for STAT

The FDA is charged with regulating the human use of biological products, such as vaccines, blood, tissues, cells, and genes, and requires many of these items to gain approval as drugs.

But there are exceptions for biological products that are “minimally manipulated” and are taken from and put back into the same patient during a single surgical procedure, so they pose little risk of spreading infection. Stem cell clinic operators have long claimed their products fall under these exceptions.

And until now, the FDA has largely left them alone.

Given that history, some industry observers say it’s possible the latest regulatory push will fizzle. Others, however, believe the agency is ready to insist on higher standards that will force many clinics to shut down or move abroad.

A Kardashian endorsement

Unapproved stem cell therapies came into vogue about a decade ago and have exploded in popularity.

Stem cell lotions, some selling for hundreds of dollars per ounce, claim to reverse aging and erase wrinkles, though experts say there’s no reason to think stem cells or their extracts would remain active in a lotion — if, indeed, they were ever added to the jar.

“It could be stem cells,” said Rubin. “Or bacon grease.”

One step up from the lotions are $500 stem cell facials, which have quite a following among celebrities; Kim Kardashian gushed about the one she received before her 2014 wedding. Stem cell experts note that these treatments, which mainly use plant stem cells applied topically, are hardly likely to regenerate human skin.

Stem cell face-lifts are popular, too: Stem cells or stem cell extracts are injected into the skin along with fat. An American Society of Plastic Surgeons task force convened in 2012 and cochaired by Rubin found the procedures offered no improvement over standard facelifts.

Most troubling to many physicians are the stem cell clinics that market to patients desperate for relief from painful conditions or cures for terminal diseases.

“All of us hate seeing those big billboards for stem cell therapy,” said Rubin, who worries that problems with unproven stem cell therapies will taint the field. “The key is to move this forward with solid, well conducted studies.”

He added: “We need to be cautious of spurious, unjustified, and unsubstantiated claims.”

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • I am very happy to share this triumphant testimony on how i was cured on Parkinson, i never believed i was ever going to be cured from Parkinson. after being diagnosed, and i was penalized on how i will ever regain my self back back after suffering for 3 years of Parkinson . finally Dr Abumere cure gave me a reason to be happy again after searching online then i found out that Dr Abumere has save many lives of this disease. behold i was filled with Joy after writing to him on his email and visited his website and he responded to me that i shouldn’t be skeptical that my disease is very simple for him to handle. i hold on to his words then i attended to every of his instruction then i purchase the herbal medicine from him in south africa that is how my medicine was send to me via delivery service and he assured me after using his HERBAL MEDICINE in just 29 days i will be cured and i will come back and thank him, i went to check myself after 29 days although before the date i was really experiencing body release and my doc confirmed me Parkinson Negative.
    I really cant thank God enough for my life and i know once you contact this herbal doctor you shall be a testimony,contact his email:(abumereherbalcentre@ gmail .com) www. abumereherbalcentre.simplesite. com

  • I need knee replacement in both knees cant have surgery due to kidneys I was thinking about this we have those clinics in tenn I have tried everything else

  • I wonder how many unsuspecting test subjects have received stem cell treatment? Honestly folks, if they don’t have any conclusive data, how can you give informed consent without understanding side effects, risk v benefits, etc? It reduces you to a lab rat –

    • You really think the FDA cares about your health, or the effectiveness of a treatment? Hell no, the FDA is one of the biggest criminal organizations in this country. Want a drug passed, get ready to write a big check to the FDA and it will get passed. Don’t think just because the FDA hasn’t approved it, that is isn’t an effective treatment. The best evidence, is often anecdotal evidence, meaning the results of those who have had the procedure. Amniotic stem cells are non aggressive cells, meaning, your body won’t have a bad reaction to them.

  • After discussing this with the orthopaedic Surgeons in Victoria and Vancouver our question is “are you getting better results for knees and hips than with platelet rich plasma”?

  • I had my right knee injected. Was limping with cart. damage and joint erosion. Walking up stairs sideways for three weeks etc… – Zero pain and jumping on shovels this past weekend! – 3 months later. Big pharma is threatened and again their attorneys ride in on their whorses to keep the billions rolling in. Mike S.

    • What did you have injected in your knee your own stem cells with bone marrow or fat? PRP or embryonic stem cells I have the same problem with both knees and conflicted on which way to go with stem cells it does look like the bone marrow stem cells or better than the fat.

  • Sounds like the medical establishment is threatened. This new option should have been open to clinical trials 20 years ago. Why should money keep spinal cord injury patients and heart patients from hope? Let the FDA establish whatever guidelines they feel they have to for clinical trials and open this up to the world.

  • Going for my second evaluation on treatment for my arthritis in my knees. Kind of apprehensive after reading this article. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    • So I had stem cells and prp and blah blah blah in my hip in 2013. I wasted 7k and it was painful. there was no follow up. I had my hip replaced last year. My advice is don’t do it.

  • Funny how this new regulatory zeal comes on the heels of 2 huge stem cell banks by major pharmaceutical companies.
    This is just another big pharmacy ploy to control a market.
    If the FDA cared about anyone es safety why would they put their seal of approval on so many dangerous, harmful drugs & tell us they are safe?
    The FDA serves as big Pharmacy shock collar so that they continue to make untold billions of dollars and kill & harm millions of people with impunity. They often referred to it as Chemo Therapy and they pay Doctors a kickback for providing victims.
    FOLLOW THE MONEY!

  • We are organizing Global Congress on Tissue Science and Regenerative Medicine (Tissue Science 2016) during December 01-02, 2016 in San Antonio, USA, with a theme “Addressing New Challenges & Emerging Issues in Regenerative Medicine and its allied areas”
    Tissue Science-2016- Tissue Science 2016 is all about promoting advanced technologies in the tissue transplantation, and working on stem cells, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to discuss materials-related strategies for disease remediation and tissue repair. Tissue Science is the use of a combination of cells, engineering and materials methods, and suitable biochemical and physicochemical factors to improve or replace biological functions. Tissue engineering involves the use of a scaffold for the formation of new viable tissue for a medical purpose. While it was once categorized as a sub-field of biomaterials, having grown in scope and importance it can be considered as a field in its own right. Tissue Science 2016 is an excellent opportunity for the delegates from Universities and Institutes to interact with the world class Scientists. This event is specially designed with 18 CPD credits (18 hrs).

  • I recently scheduled a visit with one of these clinics in Wilmington, DE. As the date of my appointment drew close, I received several calls from them I suppose to make sure I was coming! That seamed desperate to me and I began researching. This article was very helpful in causing me to reconsider any type of stem cell treatment until proper trials have been completed and FDA approval is given.
    RP Layton – NJ

Sign up for our Biotech newsletter — The Readout

Your daily guide to what’s new in biotech.