A new study out Monday could fuel the heated debate over whether electronic cigarettes are a preferable alternative to traditional cigarettes among teens or if they’re encouraging smoking among people who otherwise wouldn’t have picked up the habit.

University of Southern California researchers tracked tobacco use among five groups of high-schoolers who graduated in 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, and 2014. The number of high school seniors who’d smoked in the past month fell from 19 percent in 1995 to 9 percent in 2004. That number has fallen to about 8 percent now.

But the group of nearly 5,500 graduates from 2014 were unique — they were the first cohort who also had e-cigarettes at their disposal. When the question was expanded to ask whether the students smoked or vaped, 14 percent said they had.

advertisement

That suggests some e-cigarette users are teens who otherwise wouldn’t have smoked, the study’s authors said. The finding echoes the results of a paper published by the same group of researchers in May that found that teenagers who give e-cigarettes a try are much more likely to try regular cigarettes within a year than their peers who haven’t vaped.  

The landscape of e-cigarettes is changing, though. Last month, California raised the minimum age to purchase e-cigarettes from 18 to 21.  The FDA announced sweeping regulations for e-cigarettes in May.

STAT-Harvard Poll on E-Cigarettes

Based on a telephone poll of 1,014 US adults conducted Oct. 7-11.
Support for statements about regulation and health effects of e-cigarettes by those who have never used e-cigarettes (76%) andthose who have ever used e-cigarettes (23%) compared to the total. The sizes of the enclosed colored areas display the groups' overall negative attitudes about e-cigarettes, tobacco cigarettes, and marijuana.
Newsletters

Sign up for our Morning Rounds newsletter

Please enter a valid email address.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • The OTHER addictive product of cigarettes is SMOKE itself. Smokeless cigarettes delivering the same amount of nicotine per PUFF failed miserably.
    To wit: All adversitizements show the electronic device and the holder exhaling a ‘mist’ of Smoke (steam to me). I will wager that if the powers that be came out with a smokeless E-cigarette their sales would never exceed 2 – 6% of all e-cigarettes sold. Humans always want to be recognized and there is nothing better than “smoke signals”. Many times, one can judge the smokers mood by the way they exhale. Also a smoke filled room always sets a mood either positive, negative or somewhere in between.

  • Undeniably imagine that that you stated. Your favourite reason appeared
    to be on the net the simplest thing to be mindful of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while folks think about worries
    that they plainly do not realize about. You controlled to hit the
    nail upon the highest as neatly as outlined out the whole thing with no need
    side effect , other folks can take a signal. Will probably
    be again to get more. Thank you

  • A new study out of California could fuel the heated debate…. blah blah blah. I don’t believe any research that comes from CA in this discussion. They are the most tobacco-economy dependent state in the US, having received 13.3 billion in MSA payments (which are going down from ecigs) and $2.87 per pack cig tax. Don’t be fooled…. they need new smokers.

Sign up for our Daily Recap newsletter

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy