WASHINGTON — Some of President Obama’s top science staffers called it “the Columbo question.”

The president had a habit, just like television’s favorite detective, of making one last inquiry of his aides when being briefed on science issues. A question that “goes right to the heart of the matter,” said his chief science adviser, Dr. John Holdren, in an interview with STAT.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • John Holdren is a violent, dangerous fruit who authored a half a dozen books about genociding mankind before he made it into that carnival circus of freaks that Barack Obama called a cabinet. Holdren never did anything to warrant his office and should have never been confirmed. The Senate was not doing their jobs when they approved this idiot with a record of unstable and violent threats against all of mankind, he was as unqualified as Obama himself to work in this role.

  • Science savvy? In my book if you’ve put in a grueling five years in grad school getting a PhD and then another 2-3 years doing a post doctoral fellowship, or the MD equivalent of the above I might regard you as “science savvy”. But this also means that you have not had much time to think about anything else until you are about 35 years old, which is the minimum age to become president. I would not want such a person in the white house. A number of people with advanced scientific degrees in congress, and smartly, none of them have shown any interest in running for president.

  • Oh yes by all means President Obama, lets us save the whales, save the snails, save the trees, save, the seas, save the worms, save the germs and carbon tax all those greedy capitalists into bankruptcy for the greater glory of Gaia and one world government under the UN.

    • It’s interesting to ponder both presidents George W. and Obama, both voracious readers. It’s the actionable application of reading to current affairs that is the challenge for any of us.

      President Obama does come off like a reading comprehension savant through this article, comparable to JFKs speed reading prowess.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy