A

fter this week’s oral arguments in the patent dispute over the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology, the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT seemed to be sitting pretty: the three judges peppered the University of California’s attorney with many more skeptical questions.

And now it seems the Broad may have another ace up its sleeve: A filing claiming its scientist conceived the genome-editing invention more than a year before his rival at UC published her seminal paper on CRISPR in June 2012.

This is a STAT Plus article and you can unlock it by subscribing to STAT Plus today. It's easy! Your first 30 days are free and if you don't enjoy your subscription you can cancel any time.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

Sign up for our Morning Rounds newsletter

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine.

X