Skip to Main Content

TRENTON, N.J. — A transgender man sued a Roman Catholic hospital Thursday, saying it cited religion in refusing to allow his surgeon to perform a hysterectomy as part of his sex transition.

Jionni Conforti’s sex and gender discrimination lawsuit comes as new regulations hailed as groundbreaking anti-discrimination protections for transgender individuals are under legal attack from religious groups.


Conforti, 33, of Totowa, had scheduled the surgery at St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in Paterson in 2015. But he alleges in the federal lawsuit that a hospital administrator then told him the procedure to remove his uterus couldn’t be done because it was a “Catholic hospital.”

“I felt completely disrespected,” said Conforti, whose transition began in 2004. “That’s not how any hospital should treat any person regardless of who they are. A hospital is a place where you should feel safe and taken care of. Instead, I felt like I was rejected and humiliated.”

A spokesman for the hospital said he hadn’t yet seen the lawsuit and wasn’t able to comment.


The lawsuit comes less than a week after a federal judge in Texas ordered a halt to new US Health and Human Services regulations that had been set to go into effect Jan. 1 to bar certain forms of transgender discrimination by doctors, hospitals and insurers.

Civil rights groups had hailed the new health rules as groundbreaking, but five states, a Christian medical association and an Indiana-based network of religious hospitals sued. Judge Reed O’Connor ruled Saturday that religious hospitals would be forced to violate their religious beliefs or risk severe consequences if they didn’t change their policies.

Another legal challenge to regulations that Catholic hospitals say would force them to perform gender transitioning procedures and abortions was filed in federal court last week in North Dakota by a group of Catholic businesses and organizations, including the Catholic Benefits Association and Diocese of Fargo.

Opponents say the regulation creates a moral problem for Catholic employers and religious groups. They say Pope Francis has reiterated that Catholic teachings oppose theories that a person’s sex is alterable.

“While initiating a lawsuit is not something we take lightly, this new mandate represents a grave threat to religious freedom,” said Bishop John Folda of the Fargo diocese.

In New Jersey, Conforti, who is represented by the nonprofit Lambda Legal, said a nurse in charge of surgery confirmed the procedure could be scheduled, but his doctor was told later it wouldn’t be allowed because it was for gender reassignment.

An email cited in the lawsuit from the hospital’s director of mission services, Father Martin Rooney, said it couldn’t allow the surgery because it was a Catholic hospital. Rooney didn’t immediately return a message seeking comment.

But the hospital’s patient bill of rights guarantees medical services without discrimination based on “gender identity or expression,” the lawsuit said.

Conforti said he felt betrayed and became depressed after the hospital’s decision. Although he had the procedure performed three months later at a different hospital, he said he’s suing so no one else has to go through what he did. Conforti, who is seeking monetary damages and to require the hospital perform any needed medical care for transgender patients, cites the problem of suicide in the transgender community.

“Anything can trigger that. Something may seem small, but to a trans person, it’s not,” he said. “I don’t want other trans people to have to go through and feel what I felt.”

— Josh Cornfield

  • Hospitals are to care for sick and wounded people, not to perform unnecessary surgeries. Why is Medicare paying for? This is certainly out of line. She should not be drawing Medicare and especially not for unnecessary surgeries.

  • I feel the hopital had every right to refuse. They are not discriminating against transgender at all. If that person was sick they would have taken care. Catholics have a right as well and they all should know to go to a different hospital for these types of surgeries as well as abortions. In this case, you could also say that the person is discriminating against the hospital as well as religious beliefs, this is not fair and all he had to do was go to a different hospital. I believe there are always 2 sides to every story that should be respected, in this case the person was not sick.

    • The hospital is Catholic. that is the Catholic belief. how come he/she wants respect but gives none to the Catholic hospital that follows Catholic doctrine. This is all about selfishness and the need to make a headline, period. The liberals pushing their agenda on our beliefs. No sorry not going to work. If you are sick and in need of medical care they’ll take care of you. You do not have the right to tell anyone what their beliefs are. The government has no right to interfere with religious beliefs less they become the persecutor.

Comments are closed.