WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency’s advisory panel on children’s health gathered last week to consider a few items that had long been on its agenda: getting lead out of water, cutting pollution-related asthma, and educating doctors about toxins in toys.

The panel also took up an issue that few members could have foreseen several months ago: keeping the program off the chopping block.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • Actually, EPA is a Republican
    idea signed into reality by Richard M. Nixon. Hope the current administration will honor the spirit of its inception. Yes, over time EPA
    has made many mistakes @ over regulation. Fix it…
    “Dont throw out the baby with the bath water “! And I believe
    Congress in true bi-partisan
    fashion should work together
    for the health of all Americans.
    Amen to that ?

  • I have been effected by toxic chemicals in csrpet glue in new instillation-
    thought I had rain cancer or tumor or dieing many lab tests, 4 Drs. exminsCT SCAN-MRI no cancer or tumor– carpet glue toxic chemicals added to glue evaporate into air I breath 1222 Kennedy Pl.Apt 69-Davis Cal 95616
    owned ad installed by Broward Land – 530-306-8377 Karen Broward

  • The EPA under the Obama administration has gotten out of hand, they love to bully people and businesses. Before you stick up for these folks do your research…if you literally have a moderate size puddle of water in your backyard you may go bankrupt getting it corrected because this may be a habitat for migratory birds. Interesting though when the EPA recently turned a river orange they bolted scott free! In central Pennsylvania there is a an underground fissure that has been burning for over fifty years…they have done nothing. In Bridgeville Pa. there is a secluded neighborhood plan that is contaminated with uranium, the people are literally walking around like zombies…you guessed it, the EPA has done nothing because there is nobody to go after…the burden would be on them! These are just a few examples…most of the workers of this bureau are bored nut cases…I read one worker state they would like to see the air quality comparable to pre industrial revolution days…that would destroy the economy and what little manufacturing we have left…good riddens!

    • Do really, honestly, believe that this administration will be making decisions that are good for
      the environment?

  • Scientific data can be, and is, manipulated by many, to suit their agenda’s. Drug companies do this to get their drugs approved, and only later do we learn the whole truth about particular drugs. The same is true for chemicals of all kinds. Giving any one political faction control for a short 4/8 years, can, and should be buffered by giving the same control to an opposing view for the same 4 years. I see nothing wrong with what is happening, and will try to judge fairly what the new EPA administration does on it’s merits, not on it’s politics.

    • The key concern is, to me, any negative impacts on children’s health could take years to see in data; and by that time it may be too late to get back regulations which were actually protecting human health. I hope your judgment by merit will consider them a failure should human health suffer due to the rescinding or non-enforcement of regulations.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy