Skip to Main Content

Medicaid is not a “workfare” program. It’s our nation’s primary method of covering health care for low-income Americans.

Seema Verma, President Donald Trump’s nominee for Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, wants to change that. Although her nomination hasn’t garnered much press to date, it deserves more attention. Verma’s lack of experience with Medicare and with running a large agency are bad enough. But the harmful effect her policies could have on state Medicaid programs and their beneficiaries, in conjunction with likely congressional actions, is even worse.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED
  • “Yet the Healthy Indiana Program doesn’t offer more benefits than traditional Medicaid. We also don’t know if its beneficiaries have better health outcomes than traditional Indiana Medicaid beneficiaries, because Indiana has publicly released little data that might allow such a comparison.”

    So you didn’t take the time to look up the difference between HIP Plus and HIP Basic? Indiana doesn’t have “traditional Medicaid” and hasn’t for several years.

  • I will add that we also need to deal with healthy food availability in the poor areas. It’s much harder to become a healthier person if you don’t have access to better food. And it doesn’t sound like it addresses the fact that employers should pay workers a fair living wage so that they are not poor. No full time working person should be in the poor category range. If we had medicare for all, then all working people would be covered without employers having to bear the cost of providing benefits.

Comments are closed.