A

mid a rising toll of opioid overdoses, recommendations discouraging their use to treat pain seem to make sense. Yet the devil is in the details: how recommendations play out in real life can harm the very patients they purport to protect. A new proposal from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to enforce hard limits on opioid dosing is a dangerous case in point.

There’s no doubt that we needed to curtail the opioid supply. The decade of 2001-2011 saw a pattern of increasing prescriptions for these drugs, often without attention to risks of overdose or addiction. Some patients developed addictions to them; estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention range from 0.7 percent to 6 percent. Worse, opioid pills became ubiquitous in communities across the country, spread through sale, theft, and sharing with others, notably with young adults.

The prescribing tide has turned: Private and governmental data show that the number of prescriptions for opioids has been falling since 2012. Reassuringly, federal surveys show that misuse of pain relievers bottomed out in 2014-15.

advertisement

Nevertheless, the CDC produced a guideline in 2016 that recommended shorter durations for opioid prescriptions and the use of non-drug treatments for pain. It also suggested keeping opioid doses lower than the equivalent of 90 milligrams of morphine. As the guideline acknowledged, its recommendations reflected weak scientific evidence. Problematically, it was silent on how to care for patients already receiving doses higher than the 90 milligram threshold.

To its credit, the guideline endorsed treating patients as individuals, not numbers. A CDC official wrote to one patient that the guideline “is not a rule, regulation, or law. … It is not intended to take away physician discretion or decision-making.”

Unfortunately, these mitigating features were undermined by intemperate publicity that vilified opioids for pain. Opioids for pain “are just as addictive is heroin,” proclaimed CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden. Such statements buttress a fantasy that the tragedy of opioid overdoses and deaths will be solved in doctors’ offices, primarily by upending the care of 5 to 8 million Americans who receive opioids for pain, even when most individuals with opioid addiction did not start as pain patients.

The progression of the guidelines from “voluntary” to “enforceable” has culminated in a draft policy from CMS. It would block all prescriptions above the CDC threshold of 90 milligrams unless complex bureaucratic barriers are surmounted. Many pharmacy plans are already enforcing this approach. Under that plan, many patients suffering with chronic pain would lose access to the medicines they are currently taking, all in the name of reversing a tide of death increasingly defined by non-prescribed opioids such as heroin and fentanyl.

The logic of doing this is untested. There have been no prospective clinical studies to show that discontinuing opioids for currently stable pain patients helps those patients or anyone else. While doing so could help some, it will destabilize others and likely promote the use of heroin or other drugs. In effect, pain patients currently taking opioids long-term have become involuntary participants in an experiment, with their lives at stake.

Turning the voluntary guidelines into strict policy is unfortunate for three reasons.

First, it reflects a myopic misunderstanding of addiction’s causes, one at odds with a landmark report issued by the US surgeon general in November 2016. While the supply of drugs matters, whether people develop addiction to opioids reflects diverse factors including age, biology, and whether their lives include opportunities for rewarding activities like work and family or lacks those opportunities. Restricting prescriptions through aggressive regulation invites the outcomes seen in Prohibition, 90 years ago. To be fair to Prohibition, cirrhosis deaths did decline. But echoing that era’s gangsters and moonshine, we now face a galloping criminal trade in drugs of greater potency and lethality. Overdoses have skyrocketed, mostly from heroin and illicit fentanyl. In a Massachusetts review of overdoses, just 8 percent of those who had overdosed had received opioid prescriptions in the prior month.

Second, we have alternatives to bureaucratic controls. These include promoting and paying for treatments that de-emphasize pills. Important work by the Department of Veterans Affairs shows how to identify patients with elevated risk for harm from opioids and how to mitigate the risks.

Third and most troubling is the increasingly inhumane treatment of patients with chronic pain. Fearing investigation or sanction, physicians caring for patients on long-term opioids face a dire choice: to involuntarily terminate prescriptions for patients who are otherwise stable, or to carry on as embattled, unprotected professionals, subject to bureaucratic muscle and public shaming from every direction.

In this context, we cannot be surprised by a flurry of reports, in the press, social media, and the medical literature describing pain patients entering acute withdrawal, losing function, committing suicide, or dying in jail. The CMS policy, if adopted, will accelerate this trend.

Newsletters

Sign up for our First Opinion newsletter

Please enter a valid email address.

Many of our colleagues in addiction medicine tell us they are alarmed by the widespread mistreatment of pain patients. We receive anecdotes every week from physicians and pharmacists, most of them expert in addictions, describing pain patients who have involuntarily lost access to their pain medications and as a result have been reduced from working to bedridden adults, or who have become suicidal.

This loss of access occurs several ways. A pharmacy benefit program may refuse to cover the prescription because it has already enacted the changes that CMS is proposing to make mandatory. A physician may feel threatened by employers or regulators, and believes his or her professional survival depends on reducing opioid doses — involuntarily and without the patient’s consent — to thresholds that the CDC itself described as voluntary and not mandatory. Or state regulators have imposed such burdensome requirements that no physician in a given region can sustain prescriptions for their patients. Such patients are then “orphaned,” compelled to seek treatment from other physicians across the country.

Given the expertise in addiction among these physicians, it should be particularly worrisome that they believe the present pill-control campaign has gone too far. And yet, the ethics are clear: It should never be acceptable for us to countenance the death of one patient in the avowed service of protecting others, even more so when the projected benefit is unproven.

Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy made an underappreciated declaration in a recent interview with the New England Journal of Medicine. “We cannot allow the pendulum to swing to the other extreme here, where we deny people who need opioid medications those actual medications. … We are trying to find an appropriate middle ground,” he said.

As addiction professionals, we agree wholeheartedly.

Stefan G. Kertesz, MD, and Adam J. Gordon, MD, are physicians in both internal medicine and addiction medicine. Dr. Kertesz is an associate professor of preventive medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Dr. Gordon is a professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and editor of the journal Substance Abuse. The views expressed here are their own and do not reflect positions held by their employers.

Leave a Reply to Arlene Adams Cancel reply

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • They just started that here in Missouri I’ve been on opiates for 15 years for a terrible car wreck. They are taking people off their meds. that have been hit in semi wrecks, they don’t care? They treating us all like addicts now even though we follow the rules..I want some quality of life, I don’t want to be stuck in a bed wanting to commit suicide..”Help us here in Missouri” please!!!

  • NON-NARCOTIC-NATURAL-PAIN-KILLER-SYNTHESIZED/SCIENCE. Here is something every pain patient should know. Google the above you will see a picture of a flowering plant that is called the crepe jasmine pinwheel. It produces a pain killer that is more powerful than morphine, yet it is NON Addictive and has no side effects.. Imagine.. It has been known for years by some, researched and proven by testing on mice yet the FDA will Not approve it….

  • I am also on 10mg methadones now. This after 60mg morphine and 20 mg Oxycodone. They should have just started me on Methadone in the first place. No euphoria, no cravings. Instead it just strictly takes the pain away and let’s me live my life without wanting more – unlike the way I feel when the morphine and Oxycodone wear off. My body ends up getting sick and I need to take it just to feel normal. Nothing like that with the Methadone. They should start everyone on that and don’t even bother giving them the others which are terrible when used long term.

  • No problems getting my chronic pain medication in Florida, not yet anyway. I had a spinal fusion in ’03 because of a broken, “extra” lumbar vertebrae that shouldn’t even be there, it is a birth defect. The cadaver bone they used during the surgery didn’t “take”. It never grew, so all that hardware in my spine is rattling around loose. The pain is unbelievable. Nothing can be done to repair it, according to every specialist I’ve seen since. It ended my nursing career and put me in the house, mostly flat in bed. I was given different meds by the Pain Management Anesthesiologist at the clinic where I had the surgery. We finally found one, Methadone 10 mg, that has no side effects and doesn’t give me headaches or nausea. I don’t feel anything when I take it, just pain relieve for awhile. I’ve been taking it for a long time and my quality of life has improved, dramatically. I take it exactly as prescribed and always have. I can walk about half a block now before the pain sets in, it’s enough to get through my daily life. I am so grateful. Please don’t let them put me back in misery. I don’t have a lot of years left, I’m old now and I want to enjoy the time I have left. I keep my bottle safe and nobody comes in my house to take them or misuse them. Please don’t take my lifeline away.

Recommended Stories

Medicare
First Opinion
Prescription Bottles
First Opinion
Framingham Heart Study
First Opinion

Sign up for our Morning Rounds newsletter

Your daily dose of what’s new in health and medicine.

X