Contribute Try STAT+ Today

The Trump administration’s call on Thursday to slash almost 20 percent of the National Institutes of Health’s budget led scientists to warn that such cuts would sap biomedical research in the United States. But it also left many of them with more personal feelings: Anxiety. Fear. Sadness.

The NIH has bipartisan defenders in Congress who in recent years have been able to bolster research funding and who will likely oppose cuts as deep as President Trump has proposed. But scientists said the budget blueprint signaled that the administration does not value their work.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT+ is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • STAT+ Conversations
  • Weekly opportunities to engage with our reporters and leading industry experts in live video conversations
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
  • Probably not that he doesn’t value your work but more that the deficit is ubstainable.

    • The discoveries made through federally funded research feed the pipeline of biotech and pharma. Essentially every useful therapeutic and diagnostic tool comes from these discoveries. The economy benefits from jobs and revenue. The NIH is, and has always been, a good investment and the dollars are a relative pittance. But it’s only been the last 6-7 years that the tea party has made it a partisan issue.

    • This is not true. While it’s not great to operate on large deficits eternally, our spending is mostly defense and healthcare, and our current deficits aren’t too shabby compared to the growth of our economy. Reducing military spending by a sliver would pay for the NIH budget.

  • Why is our tax payer dollars given away to researchers in other countries when we have so many unemployed junior and even senior scientists here in the US?

    • “so many”? where are your statistics for this statement? do you even know how science works these days?? you collaborate. I’ll tell you what a bad idea is – isolationist science. our lab has several international and national collaborations, and all of us are better for it.

Comments are closed.