Has the age of the biotech blockbuster come to a close?

Over the past year, a string of would-be best-sellers, expected to generate billions in sales, have wilted into commercial disappointments amid a fractious debate about the cost of medicine. Another highly touted — and highly priced — treatment won approval on Tuesday, and the industry may soon find out whether those failures were aberrant blips or a frightening glimpse of the new normal.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus. To get you started, enjoy 50% off your first 3 months!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • I’ve done dog and pony shows with these Wall Street types who go for a rosy Powerpoint presentation and a $2000 Zegna suit. The reality is that there are very few drugs that come close to their projections in income.

  • A good column, thank you, about the issues confronting the economic realities of new drugs, their pricing and their approvals.

    My issue is with CVS/Caremark being both a major pharmacy benefits manager and the largest pharmacy chain store in America. On the positive side, they can negotiate large discounts for drugs in their formularies. But they can then, also, decide how much savings they pass on to consumers. They will also, sometimes, exclude a drug from coverage to try and force discounts but, if that ploy doesn’t work, leave patients without the most optimal drug or no treatment alternative at all.

    On the negative side, what they decide on the insured side of their business has a direct impact on the profitability of the pharmacy chain. You can put up all the firewalls you want but it’s still one company from a reporting perspective.

    And, in the middle, there is the patient who wants the best choice for their medical issue. Yes, sometimes physicians prescribe a drug that has an equal, lower-cost alternative and that’s to everyone’s benefit, other than a pharma company’s bottom line. But, a determination of what’s really best is murkier when two sides of the same company enter into a self-interested calculus unknown, and unseen, by patients and regulators.

    Believing that the best decisions will always be made in the interests of the patient is a bit too altruistic for my taste.

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy