President Trump’s pick to run federal mental health services has called for a bold reordering of priorities — shifting money away from education and support services and toward a more aggressive treatment of patients with severe psychiatric disorders.

The proposal has some psychiatrists — a generally liberal bunch — cheering despite their distrust of the Trump administration.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus. To get you started, enjoy 50% off your first 3 months!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • A nurse practitioner friend of mine told me The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual is just a code so psychiatrists can get paid a lot of money.

  • The problem is, once you define mental illness(es) (severe or otherwise) as “brain diseases” (despite a *complete* lack of scientific evidence demonstrating it, yes, that’ correct), the only “real” treatment becomes pharmacological (everything else is just “ameliorative”, helping people “come to terms” with their “condition”).

    Oh yes, it also then makes it possible to use coercion on people “for their own good” (and out of “compassion”).

  • Tim Murphy says there’s no science in SAMHSA? How about in biopsychiatry? It’s all smoke and mirrors (and to say the federal government has been emphasizing peer recovery is like saying the DoD overprioritizes pacifism).

    • Yeah, that’s a laugh, eh? The psychiatric profession complaining about someone being unscientific? Where they are operating on scientific verities like “Mathematics Disorder” or “Intermittent Explosive Disorder” or “Oppositional Defiant Disorder” or “Disruptive Mood Regulation Disorder?” And they VOTE their disorders in and out of existence? It would be funny, except that people take them seriously and they have a lot of power to do serious damage!

  • Psychiatric hospitals are set to see a boost in population as they rival the prison system & Trump turns over their running to private for-profit corporations.

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy