The clinical trial for a herpes vaccine flouted just about every norm in the book: American patients were flown in to the Caribbean island of St. Kitts for experimental injections. Local authorities didn’t give permission. Nor did the Food and Drug Administration. Nor did a safety panel.

That’s why the trial — run by a startup that has since received funding from billionaire investor Peter Thiel — prompted widespread alarm and censure when it was reported last week by Kaiser Health News.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT Plus is a premium subscription that delivers daily market-moving biopharma coverage and in-depth science reporting from a team with decades of industry experience.

What's included?

  • Authoritative biopharma coverage and analysis, interviews with industry pioneers, policy analysis, and first looks at cutting edge laboratories and early stage research
  • Subscriber-only networking events and panel discussions across the country
  • Monthly subscriber-only live chats with our reporters and experts in the field
  • Discounted tickets to industry events and early-bird access to industry reports

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • I find STANFORD PROFESSOR Dr. John Ioannidis’ research incredibly inciteful and all Doctors evaluations to be so accurate. From previous CONUS/OCONUS MEDICAL Clinical Research & IT IMS Mgmt. Lead experience, there was then and I see there is a tremendous need today for USA CENTRALIZED, DESIGN & CONTROLLED INFRASTRUCTURES, UNIVERSALLY DEPLOYED, PROVIDE GUIDANCE & ACOUNTABILITY TO THE ENTIRE Clinical Trials and preclinical trials research.
    There is not an amount or billions of $ that would unify the entire process unless it is one single infrastructures. Of course where a review safety board, lead investigator and clinical teams have their review and suggest qualified and approved deviation.
    With technology mobility, drones, technology adaptability, and remote power source availability there is no excuse to run culture based trials, except where unknown data is not available such as birth date, or other MED-Bio- historical demographic input is difficult and should be then questioned.
    In reading the article, most issues are related to trial recruitment, data collection, cultural demographic efforts. All true but we must not disregard, weight of results disparity based on sample collection, environmental extreme conditions, test conducted, chemistries, equipment used, instrument up-keep & historical review to qualification/validation and reporting methods. All are as much contributors as the meals injected prior to test, vitamin regime and any other cultural and biological, emotional impacting aspects.

    I actually love how David Thiel’s funded experimental trial was planned. Aside from FDA or SAFETY REVIEW BD. approval, that Herpes trial standardized a lot of inherent geographical, cultural, issues. By providing a hook “Caribbean trip” for otherwise probably afflicted vs. neglected population.
    Management would have wasted a lot of time and effort getting approval by either FDA or credentials worried Safety Board anyway. That was easy! Saved on already low standard (0.7%-1.9%) site inspections and providing trial and cohorts were run ethically and test were conducted accordingly, it looks like a promising model to me.

Sign up for our Daily Recap newsletter

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy