This story was produced in collaboration with WebMD and Medscape.
Most doctors have absorbed racist, sexist, and other bigoted verbal remarks from patients under their care, according to a new national survey. And in interviews, physicians say these ugly incidents, while not frequent, can leave lasting scars.
African-American doctors told STAT they had been called racial epithets and been asked to relinquish care for white patients by family members — and even colleagues. Asian-American physicians reported being demeaned with longstanding cultural and racist stereotypes, and female doctors being sexually harassed by patients during physical exams.
A wide-ranging survey of more than 800 U.S. physicians, conducted by WebMD and Medscape in collaboration with STAT, found that 59 percent had heard offensive remarks about a personal characteristic in the past five years — chiefly about a doctor’s youthfulness, gender, race, or ethnicity. As a result, 47 percent had a patient request a different doctor, or ask to be referred to a clinician other than the one their physician selected.
Fourteen percent said they had experienced situations in which the patient complained, in writing, about the doctor’s personal characteristics.
African-American and Asian-American physicians were more likely to face such attacks, and female doctors were more often the victims of bias than males. But patients found targets in every imaginable corner: 12 percent of physicians, for instance, endured offensive remarks about their weight.
Amid a heated national conversation about open expressions of prejudice in America, the survey spotlights a facet of the issue that has, so far, received little attention: the biases patients direct toward their doctors in hospitals and exam rooms.
“I’ve certainly not read anything like this,” said Dr. Beth A. Lown, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical director of the Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare.
To explore issues raised in the survey, STAT interviewed Lown and eight other doctors and researchers around the country who are women or identify as members of minority groups. They described often disturbing encounters with patients.
Lown and others noted that patients have been more actively voicing their care preferences in recent years. “Has this changed socially accepted norms about what you can and cannot say to a health care professional?” Lown asked. “Is this … unmasking attitudes that have been there all along and now, in our polarized societies, people feel less constrained in expressing them? Probably.”
Medical researchers have studied clinicians’ unconscious biases toward patients, said Kerth O’Brien, a social psychologist at Portland State University who studies discrimination in health care. “But much less is known about patients’ biases toward clinicians, and that is why the current study is important.”
“Why would patients allow their own irrational biases to get in the way of their health care?” she added. “Clearly we need to learn more.”
The online survey of 822 physicians was conducted by Medscape’s research team in July and August and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percentage points.
In the follow-up interviews, some doctors said they understand why patients might express their prejudices.
“Often we meet people at their lowest,” said Dr. Nikhil “Sunny” Patel, a psychiatry resident at Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts. “Sometimes we can have primitive responses to stressful situations, and one of them can be targeting of the other when we’re feeling cornered or vulnerable.”
But empathy only goes so far. Doctors who have been on the receiving end of verbal abuse said the medical system has barely acknowledged the issue, much less studied it or developed a response to it, leaving them largely on their own to deal with the psychic wounds.
In the survey, the vast majority of physicians said their organizations provided no training, or had no formal policies, on handling patient bias, or they didn’t know about them.
The silence of well-intentioned supervisors who have never been trained in how to manage such situations can make matters worse, said Dr. Esther Choo, an associate professor at Oregon Health and Science University.
“There are a lot of people who’ve witnessed it, and who want to support their peers and simply don’t know how. And in that void is more hurt,” she said. “If you have a white preceptor and they’re witnessing it and they don’t say anything, the assumption is that they agree with it or they don’t see it, or they see it but think it’s not a problem.”
Choo’s Aug. 13 Twitter thread about her experience treating — or attempting to treat — white nationalists, unleashed a torrent of conversation among doctors who had endured similar experiences. In the wake of such dialogue, many researchers and health systems are looking at the issue formally for the first time.
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is further along. Responding to an in-house study of discriminatory behavior by patients, it recently revised its “patients rights and responsibilities” policy to cover situations in which patients direct discriminatory behavior toward staff. The hospital now won’t honor requests for a new physician based on patient prejudices.
The stakes are high, said Dr. Brian McGillen, Penn State Health’s director of hospital medicine. “You come here and pour your blood, sweat, and tears for your patients, and then to have that stuff come up, absolutely it’ll lead to burnout,” he said. “There’s no doubt in my mind.”
Below, eight physicians who have felt the sting of discrimination recount their experiences, and how they coped.
“Anybody who says they’re not bruised by these encounters, we’re sort of kidding ourselves.”
Dr. David Patterson, associate clinical professor of medicine at George Washington University Hospital
While in medical school at Vanderbilt in the ’80s, Patterson encountered an older gentleman from northern Alabama, who stopped him during their first meeting.
“He said, ‘Why are you asking me all these questions?’ I said, ‘Well, sir, you agreed to allow students to interview you, examine you and so forth.’ And he looked at me and said, ‘Yeah, but when I said that, I didn’t know Vanderbilt had [racial slur] in their classes.’”
Once people are entrenched in their beliefs, Patterson said, “there’s not a lot you’ll be able to do to change that attitude. So the way I’ve always dealt with it is to just move on. Take it in, try to stay on your feet, stay balanced and keep moving forward.
“But anybody who says they’re not bruised by these encounters, we’re sort of kidding ourselves.”
The bruising can also come from the thoughtless reactions of colleagues. Patterson recalled that on his first day at George Washington University Hospital, he started an IV line for an older white patient.
The family soon objected to Patterson’s care because he is black, and they met with his attending physician — a white woman who later approached Patterson with a compromise: He could enter the patient’s room as long as he was accompanied by a white colleague.
“It was a little disappointing that someone who was supposedly a mentor and a teacher would think that solution would work. We both refused to do it. And I don’t know if our attending ever really got it.”
Patterson was eventually named as the director of the medical school’s teaching program, where, at one point, a patient refused care from a team of trainees because they all were African-Americans.
“So we go down to the emergency room to greet this patient and she … says, ‘Well, I want to talk to the person who’s in charge of the teaching program.’ And I said ‘You’re looking at him,’” Patterson said.
But by the end of her hospitalization, Patterson added, “she came to me and said, ‘I really apologize. I started off on the wrong foot. These young women took phenomenal care of me.’”
“It’s like running a race that’s super hard. But one person’s carrying an invisible heavy boulder on their back.”
Dr. Esther Choo, associate professor at Center for Policy and Research in Emergency Medicine at Oregon Health and Science University
The most extreme examples of patient bias, Choo said, involve people who refuse to be treated by anyone but a white doctor. “It’s not uncommon, but it’s not every day,” she said.
For her, the bias is expressed in a multitude of ways. “It’s questions like, ‘Do you feel like you can practice western as well as eastern medicine?’ Or, ‘Where are you from? Because we definitely hate Chinese doctors, but, oh, thank God you’re not Chinese.’ I just happen not to be. Or they’ll say Oriental instead of Asian, or say other stereotypes about Asians they’ll joke about or talk about in this weird way.”
Her experiences with patient bias started as soon as she began her medical education, she said.
“I remember being surprised and embarrassed and humiliated as a medical student when people would say these things. … When it happens to you as a trainee, you tend to think it’s your fault on some level. I know that’s weird. You think, ‘Maybe it’s because I’m not competent or maybe I am less smart than a different doctor. Or maybe I shouldn’t be here?’ There’s a lot of shame in being the target of racism, and I think that’s part of it.
“It hardly every bothers me anymore. I usually make a joke out of it or deflect it, but the big question is how it’s affecting our trainees and our junior doctors. What is the scope of this problem, and what’s the sequelae?”
The questions loom large, she said, for an industry that is trying to grow more diverse.
“How do you do that when it’s a really challenging and hard and long path, and on top of that, let’s just tell you you’ll experience racism — this extra burden. It’s like running a race that’s super hard. But one person’s carrying an invisible heavy boulder on their back. They have to work so much harder.”
“There was no one to talk to about it. No one talks about this stuff.”
Dr. Beth A. Lown, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and medical director at The Schwartz Center for Compassionate Healthcare
Bigoted behavior can essentially paralyze doctors, Lown said. “Because of our sense of professionalism and our code of ethics, we’re committed to letting that stuff roll off our backs, but meanwhile all your emotions are boiling inside, and you’re thinking, ‘Oh, my God, what do I do now? What do I say? How do I behave?’
“I’m very petite. I’m like 5 feet tall. So when I first started out, everybody would say, ‘You don’t look old enough to be a doctor.’ All the time. Get me somebody who’s a grown-up was the implication. … It makes you very anxious — which exists in high titers anyway when you’re in medicine.”
More recently, one longtime patient, during an exam, suddenly turned the conversation to Jews, she said: “Like, ‘All they’re interested in is money, and they’re out to cheat you, they’re money grubbers’ — the old stereotypes, and how you have to be on your guard all the time.
“I did nothing. And I was very upset with myself that I said nothing. But I didn’t know what to say. I thought, ‘Do you know that I’m Jewish? Are you really saying this to me?’ … I didn’t tell anybody. There was no one to talk to about it. No one talks about this stuff.
“You just have to set it aside and compartmentalize it, and pretend somehow, somewhere that it didn’t happen. My job is to be a professional, maintain some compassion and just don’t let it influence your care. And that’s a struggle.”
“If you’ve got a patient who’s disrespectful or untrusting for any reason, it basically poisons the relationship.”
Dr. Somnath Saha, professor of medicine and public health and preventive medicine at Portland VA Medical Center and Oregon Health and Science University
Saha is one of the few who has researched patient bias, and he has also experienced it. “I’m a brown person who works in the VA, so we treat a lot of older white men who have kind of older white men’s attitudes sometimes,” he said.
One patient, for instance, asked to change doctors because he hated the smell of curry. “As if I’d come into the office with curry on my breath,” said Saha, who is of Indian descent.
He eats curry infrequently, he said, and had not done so before seeing the patient.
Saha agreed to transfer the patient to another doctor. “When there is bias expressed by a patient, it’s basically a deal killer, because to have an effective doctor-patient relationship, rapport is everything. And if you’ve got a patient who’s disrespectful or untrusting for any reason, it basically poisons the relationship.”
In one of Saha’s research projects, he studied patients’ comfort with people from other racial backgrounds. Patients who had negative views of other racial groups tended to rate their doctors worse in general.
“That might just be a reflection of the fact that people who have negative racial attitudes just have negative attitudes, period. But the white patients who had negative racial attitudes gave particularly low marks to minority doctors.”
The discrimination has financial implications, Saha said, because it seeps into physician ratings, which can determine a doctor’s compensation levels.
“Patients making advances at me is degrading to say the least.”
Dr. Jessica Faiz, emergency medicine resident at Boston Medical Center
Faiz, who is 27, moved to Boston from the Bronx earlier this year to begin her residency as an emergency physician. Patients’ sexist behavior has challenged her throughout her training.
“Patients making advances at me is degrading to say the least. Especially after all I’ve been through to get to this point. … A lot of the patients I’ve worked with are very marginalized and disenfranchised — so it’s not coming necessarily from a place of malice. They’re sick. So I cope with this by not considering it a personal offense. But still, as with any sexist remarks, I walk away from those situations feeling totally unclean, even if I didn’t do anything, and it was done to me.
“You’re wearing professional clothes and you have the knowledge, and you’re still being put in situation where people are asking about your personal life and asking completely inappropriate questions. I’m trying to work at it, and take time and reflect and step back, so I don’t get disenchanted with the patients I’m serving and feel resentment toward them.”
“Our job is to be caretakers, but it’s also to care for each other.”
Dr. Nikhil Patel, psychiatry resident at Cambridge Health Alliance
Patel said he was in his first year of residency training when a patient raged at him because the patient believed — evidently based on Patel’s beard and the color of his skin — that Patel was a member of ISIS.
“It was like, ‘Go back to where you came from; this is going to be our country again, you [expletive] raghead.’ He decided to just leave the hospital and he stormed out. And I was actually very worried about him.”
Patel said the experience shook him.
“That was probably the first time I’ve ever felt that othered. That feeling like, ‘Wow, I’ve trained at decent institutions; I thought that would be a protective factor. I thought my clinical acumen would be protective against violent vitriol. I was deluded in that belief. This country I call home — is it home? Then where is home? I thought this country was a country of immigrants.
“And things can be less insidious than that. Like ‘Wow, your English is so good.’ Yeah, not to be arrogant, but I went to grad school twice. But that’s not the point. The conceptualization of me, as a bearded brown man, is of the other.”
Patel said that he has found support among a group of physicians that discusses such matters, but that the broader medical community should place more emphasis on addressing racism in the hospital.
“Our job is to be caretakers, but it’s also to care for each other. To speak up for other health professionals on the team and not be punitive about it, but set the tone that we can’t tolerate a culture where people feel targeted.”
“One patient’s son pushed [a doctor] against the wall and called him a [homophobic slur] and asked him where he parked his camel.”
Dr. Brian McGillen, director of hospital medicine at Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
McGillen said patient discrimination against some of his staff members persuaded him to survey doctors at his hospital more broadly.
“I was not close to expecting the huge response I received: sexual orientation, ethnicity, suspected religion, female residents on the basis of gender. …
“One patient’s son pushed [a doctor] against the wall and called him a [homophobic slur] and asked him where he parked his camel.”
Penn State Health convened a workshop on the topic, which helped convince hospital administrators to revise the patients’ rights and responsibilities statement. That statement now explicitly prohibits patients from requesting a change of doctors on the basis of the physician’s ethnicity, or religious or sexual identity. Women may still request a female doctor. And doctors who receive discriminatory complaints can switch the patient to another provider if they wish.
”In this day and age when people walk into hospitals and open fire, we need to be sure our workforce feels protected,” he said. “We all want to honor this notion of patient experience — and improving that is certainly a goal, but you can swing the pendulum too far, and at the risk of damaging your staff, who you really need to be healthy and not be burned out by this stuff.”
“We need to keep better records of this, because it’s happening more than we know.”
Dr. Emily Whitgob, fellow in Stanford Medicine’s division of developmental-behavioral pediatrics
Like Saha, Whitgob has helped spearhead the study of patient bias toward physicians. She, too, has experienced such behaviors during her training.
“I remember being in a situation with male patients, in a surgical clinic at the VA, and I had to do general exams, and they made jokes asking whether am I enjoying it. People almost laughed it off, like ‘Well, now I experienced it too.’ I didn’t stop to think, ‘Am I being threatened?’”
Whitgob said her VA rotation was done in a month, “but if, day-in and day-out, that’s what you have to deal with, or you’re a nurse who deals with this every day, there’s no escaping it.”
Trainees, she said, have the option of declining to care for patients who direct abusive behavior at them. But supervisors must understand the importance of properly communicating the trainee’s decision to patients.
If the supervisor tells a patient that the trainee has been removed, she said, “the patient who didn’t want the trainee in the room is getting what they want. That wouldn’t be the intention, but that would be the effect.”
Whitgob said most hospitals support their medical staffs when it comes to biased patients, but they only do so in a “reactive” way, and not proactively state their policies in the manner of Penn State’s new initiative.
“Ideally if every hospital system could adopt this policy, patients would say, ‘I expect my doctor to respect me,’ and doctors would say the same.
“We need to keep better records of this, because it’s happening more than we know, and once people start talking about it, they bring up stories from 10, 15 years ago that they never thought they could talk about.”
Update: WebMD and Medscape have provided a more detailed description of the survey’s methodology.
Well, that was a pretty fascinating read, not going to lie. I really hope you continue to write. Probably one of the more informative pieces I’ve read on this subject. Thanks!
My comment below, the only survivor of many, has been edited without my knowlege or consent. Although what remains is valuable insight, the thrust of my commentary on the contents of this article has been excised. My original remarks included the valid observation, that of all the professions, Doctoring has the least justification for self-pity about being contradicted by irate clients.
Medicine is based on one of the least trustworthy sciences : medical science is still in kindergarten, overwhelmed by seemingly fractal endless unknowns. As such, pretending to be authoritative is wholly dishonest and completely unnecessary.
The reason doctors feel alienated by their encounters with their needy patients is simple : they insist on thinking themselves better than their client. The absence of egalitarianism in modern medical practice has poisoned the therapeutic relationship. A poison to self-respect, a poison which both patient and doctor imbibe by accepting the implicit insult to the afflicted individual.
Admittedly, stupidity (which is endemic in the unhealthy) is the most exasperating of afflictions to treat because it introduces futility into our expenditure of effort : the stupid are tenaciously attached to their stupidity.
So disheartening was the stupefying of my advice into meaninglessness, that my intolerance of futility drove me to leave the medical profession for a career in mechanical engineering, where i would surely have some satisfaction from tangible improvements to the human commonwealth.
This change of discipline was most fortuitous, in that engineering design is merciless : errors announce themselves with no regard to our embarrassment or the brilliance of all the elements we got right. An error in project engineering can bankrupt a company ; this heavy burden of responsibility turned me into a workaholic. Thoroughness is a definitive necessity in engineering : the temptation to race ahead must be strictly self-disciplined. It was a relief to be retrenched in the twilight of manufacturing in defeatist Australia.
Since then, i have had the luxury of fulfilling my boyhood ambition of being an experimental scientist and inventor. This noble enterprise for a while suffered the indignity of being financed by unemployment benefits, and now is financed by the Age Pension (there is no profit in knowledge that cannot be sold to a society jaded by the cynicism that is cultivated by tolerating liars).
As a medical first responder (Melbourne Ambulance Service 1972 to 1979) i was treated with almost universal friendliness : nobody offends those on whose goodwill their life may depend. Even the rich were egalitarians when i was in uniform.
It therefore follows that when an individual is rude to a doctor : they have been convinced that the doctor is an obstacle to getting relief from their distress.
For doctors to use their failure-to-meet-an-imperative in an afflicted individual as a pretext for self-Pity : this is a grotesque abandonment of the sacred vow of selfless service that is central to the healing craft. Without empathy plus egalitarian solidarity, doctoring becomes a toxic travesty . . . of narcisism exploiting vulnerability.
Few patients have the insight to see their corrupted ‘therapeutic relationship’ in this perspective, but they surely recognise indifference and condescension when their perceived survival needs are not being meet.
No rational individual would be surprised that condescension’s insult to a desperate patient’s self-worth triggers anger, yet our overPrivileged delicate doctors insist that patients must not bring these feelings into the consulting room. Feelings have been deconstructed out of “modern” medicine, and we are all the worse for this convenient denial of reality and responseAbility that GPs now affect with priestlike expectation of unlimited deference.
Pain is perhaps the most compelling of all incentives : it is relentless, haunting & disabling its victims in every moment they are awake. To expect those in pain to accept shoddy workmanship from a doctor . . . is a meaningful measure of the Superiority that GPs arrogate to themselves in an attempt to bolster their exhausted self-esteem.
This is why selflessness is an essential discipline of medical practice :
to prevent a cowardly retreat into narcissistic denial of the patient’s reality.
Until we make our selves unimportant & adaptable we cannot be trustworthy doctors.
Honest journalism is a cornerstone of public sanity,
and thus is of comparable importance to Medicine in accomplishing an authentic civilisation.
Please do not meddle with my contributions to Stat again, for they shall cease. Worse than rude, the suppression of informed dissent diminishes the value of your magazine, and with it diminishes the collective intelligence of mankind. Meanwhile, to delete trivial or irrelevant or malignant comments is good housekeeping.
They discriminate against men, because women can request a female provider for intimate care but MEN can NOT.
What about the scars men endure from being forced to be exposed in the presence of females?
I guess that means Penn State health will be hiring male L&D nurses.
For a paradoxic true perspective on the unspoken problem of client disSatisfaction, see Atlantic Newspaper article “A crop of books by disillusioned physicians reveals a corrosive doctor-patient relationship at the heart of our health-care crisis”.
My assessment is that the cause of this dysfunction in patient/doctor relationships is that doctors have abandoned egalitarian attitudes with their clients, in favour of indulging in self-importance [ie: self-pity] . . . at the cost of cancelling the essential medical skill/discipline of empathy.
With lost Empathy goes perceptiveness and kindness and generosity, all of which are alarmingly scarce in my many encounters with doctors in the recent 30 years.
For the importance of equality in optimising individual outcomes, see
Peter Mann…. Let me begin by saying “thanks” and the person that brought up this article. I read your comment above and it gave me a whole lot of parallel insight to the situation. Let me quote you briefly ” nobody offends those on whose goodwill their life may depend. Even the rich were egalitarians when i was in uniform.” It is on that premise I wish to draw from. The moment we treat others as humans and not some experimental objects….the moment they see the passion of your vocation; that passion to alleviate their pains instead of trying to show to them that you’v passed through 7 or 8 years of thorough studies, then they will in turn treat the doctors as gods/goddesses.
Comments are closed.