CLEVELAND — In recent years, doctors nationwide have lamented ever-rising drug prices that are limiting patient access to crucial medicines and undermining hospital finances.

But a ballot initiative in Ohio is flipping that script. Several prominent physician and hospital groups are joining pharmaceutical companies to oppose a proposal to rein in drug costs paid by state agencies.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • STAT+ Conversations
  • Weekly opportunities to engage with our reporters and leading industry experts in live video conversations
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
  • Clearly the federal government needs to regulate drug prices. This is the only way to stop the greed at the expense of society.

  • n.r. jones sounds much better informed about this than I am. Her concerns about the politics of the proposed legislation sound well-founded as does her criticism of the current article.
    Unanswered questions include why the OMA needs to make a statement at all and why it aligns itself with the pharmaceutical industry. While benefits cannot be known with certainty, critics should propose modification or realistic alternatives that will lower drug prices. Further I wonder how much drug companies could raise prices with national chains and mail-order PBM’s filling so many prescriptions.

  • Let’s set the record straight. This story implies that all healthcare professionals are against Issue 2. In fact, Issue 2 is backed by National Nurses United, the nation’s largest nurses union, and by the Ohio Academy of Family Physicians. The board of directors of the Ohio State Medical Assn. has influential members (Dr. Marvin Rorick and Dr. Holly Thacker, among them) who have lived well off drug industry financial support; the association’s board secret vote to oppose Issue 2 has never been fully documented or explained. The association prexy, Chatham says “we have closely” reviewed Issue 2. Let’s see the association’s analysis. I doubt if it exists. Did the reporter ask to see it? OSMA’s support is knee-jerkism. Certainly Issue 2 was not invited to provide a competing argument. Same with the hospital association. Which reminds me – Dr. Cosgrove, head of the Cleveland Clinic, has indicated his sympathy for Issue 2 while (politely) ripping the drug industry for charging its U.S. customers 3, 4 and sometimes 10 times more than it charges its foreign customers.

    A phony argument (taken out of PhRMA’s playbook) that the author gullibly repeats: Oh, dear what about those drugs not on the VA’s formulary, so confusing!! Stop being confused. Issue 2 does not prevent those drugs from being purchased. It simply says drugs that are on the VA formulary shall be bought at VA prices.

    Another reporting problem: why does the reporter believe anything Dale Butland has to say. Anything he says would be impeachable in a court of law. This same Dale Butland in 2003 was tearing up the pea patch, saying the drug industry was ruthless and predatory. Read the Cincinnati Enquirer stories from that period. Now he’s talking a different story because he’s on PhRMA’s payroll.

Comments are closed.

Sign up to receive a free weekly opinions recap from our community of experts.
Privacy Policy