WASHINGTON — Chuck Grassley wasted little time this week in unveiling his drug-pricing agenda, attaching his name to a trio of bills that, as the new chair of the Senate Finance Committee, he is freshly empowered to advance.

Grassley, an Iowa Republican, was among the many lawmakers who hurried to announce bills to lower drug costs, many of which have stalled in past sessions but that now enjoy renewed enthusiasm, as President Trump and Democrats on Capitol Hill continue their pharmaceutical industry focus.

Topping the list: a bill Grassley proposal with Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) that would allow Americans to import drugs from Canada for personal use — a proposal Grassley has previously supported but had been championed by the late Sen. John McCain.


Grassley said Wednesday that he would bring back two other bills on the topic with Democrats: the CREATES Act, which aims to crack down on anticompetitive behavior from brand-name manufacturers, and a bill to ban the practice of “pay-for-delay,” when companies pay generic manufacturers to delay production of off-patent drugs, as two other top priorities.

Grassley, speaking at a Wednesday roundtable with reporters, also said he would examine potentially anticompetitive practices involving insurers and pharmacy benefit managers.

Grassley — who is not seen as a drug industry ally — largely expressed support for the Trump administration’s drug-pricing agenda. But he signaled preliminary opposition to health secretary Alex Azar’s proposal to align reimbursements for prescription drugs with foreign prices, but said he would wait until a public comment period had closed before responding formally.

“Initially, I don’t want foreign countries setting our drug prices,” Grassley said. “What can he do to modify that, so that principle isn’t violated?”

Even legislation that typically has enjoyed the support of only Democrats was unveiled this week as a bipartisan effort: a bill from Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) to allow Medicare’s prescription drug benefit to negotiate prices directly with manufacturers.

Its new co-author this Congress: Rep. Francis Rooney, a Republican who, in a statement, said it was an “unconscionable abuse to the American people that pharma does not compete for drugs provided under Medicare Part D.”

Grassley, one of the authors of the 2003 legislation that created Part D, said he would consider a finance committee examination of whether pharmaceutical companies are “gaming the system” of charging Medicare, but that he remained opposed to allowing the health secretary to negotiate with manufacturers directly.

“I feel very strongly that we don’t mess with that, based on the proposition that Part D is the only federal government program I’ve ever been involved in that has come in under budget,” Grassley said.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a frequent and vocal critic of the drug industry, is also set to unveil his own drug pricing proposals on Thursday, one of which is is conceptually similar to the Trump administration international reference pricing proposal.

Sanders’ version, which includes a provision that could strip drug companies of exclusive licenses if negotiations stall, enjoys the co-sponsorship of Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the chair of the House Oversight Committee. Cummings has indicated he will aggressively police the industry, telling STAT last week he would likely call drug industry executives before Congress to testify about high drug costs, calling drug pricing his “no. 1 priority.”

In the coming weeks and months, several other Democratic senators are also expected to revive legislation they brought up in the final weeks of the previous Congress. Cory Booker (N.J.) released legislation last month to prevent drug companies from manipulating state Medicaid coverage decisions. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) also unveiled a drug-pricing proposal in December: a federal agency to manufacture generic drugs.

Klobuchar and her Democratic colleagues, Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), and Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), also introduced a bill to aggressively police price-gouging late in the last Congress.

In a Republican-controlled Senate, many of the more ambitious pieces of legislation are unlikely to become law — or even receive committee hearings or votes. But as the White House continues to agitate on drug costs and with Democrats in control of the House of Representatives, many on Capitol Hill believe both parties have incentive to pass legislation in the next two years.

It would also fulfill the will of voters across the country, who, according to a poll last week, hope the high cost of prescription drugs will be Congress’ top priority in 2019.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • Great story. I will be contacting members of Congress who seek to lower drug prices. I’m hoping that they address the following: People like me can’t participate in a discount program offered by a manufacturer if they get government aid like Medicare. I could be receiving a drug I really need that costs $1,000 a month for $15.

  • I always wonder why these lawmakers avoid the cause of these high drug prices. That being the PBM’s. Do they think that the stealing that goes on will go away? Or are the PBM’s paying the lawmakers off to look the other way ?

Sign up for our Daily Recap newsletter

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy