Federally funded research labs conduct thousands of experiments that rely on monkeys and other nonhuman primates — and now, Congress is ramping up its scrutiny of that science.

As part of the congressional appropriations process in the House this year, lawmakers directed both the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration to produce reports detailing the ways the agency’s scientists use the thousands of nonhuman primates in their research centers.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • So – animal rights activists prefer to lose loved ones, to diseases that have no cure, for simple lack of effective research specimens ?? And drag all other humans down with them ?? Some primate research is unavoidable in order to find cures for human diseases. Those activists keep forgetting that to remain on top of the food chain, certain sacrifices will always need to be made. It seems though that they would rather become extinct themselves ?

  • I would bet that there are many prison inmates who would be willing to undergo use as medical guinea pigs in exchange for better living conditions, sentence reductions, monetary and other compensations. I have never understood the use of animals in scientific testing nor can I see any justification for it. And if we are to be completely honest, many of these diseases are inherited and could be completely eliminated with genetic testing, counseling, and therapeutic abortion. There is nothing special or sacrosanct about homo sapiens, regardless of what today’s Elmer Gantrys wish us to think.

    • If Beth thinks that prisoners, who live in an inherently coercive setting, are capable of informed consent, freely given, she is sadly mistaken! We must not go back to the bad old days of using institutionalized people as research subjects. The use of animals, including nonhuman primates, eliminated the widespread use of human subjects in basic research.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy