As opioid addiction and deadly overdoses escalated into an epidemic across the U.S., thousands of surgeons continued to hand out far more pills than needed for postoperative pain relief, according to a KHN-Johns Hopkins analysis of Medicare data.
Many doctors wrote prescriptions for dozens of opioid tablets after surgeries — even for operations that cause most patients relatively little pain, according to the analysis, done in collaboration with researchers at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. It examined almost 350,000 prescriptions written for patients operated on by nearly 20,000 surgeons from 2011 to 2016 — the latest year for which data are available.
Some surgeons wrote prescriptions for more than 100 opioid pills in the week following the surgery, often with instructions to take one to two pills every four to six hours, as needed. The total amounts frequently exceeded current guidelines from several academic medical centers, which call for zero to 10 pills for many of the procedures in the analysis, and up to 30 for cardiac bypass surgery.
While hundreds of state and local lawsuits have been filed against opioid manufacturers, claiming they engaged in aggressive and misleading marketing of these addictive drugs, the role of physicians in contributing to a national tragedy has received less scrutiny. Research shows that a significant portion of people who become addicted to opioids started with a prescription after surgery.
In sheer numbers, opioid prescribing in the U.S. peaked in 2010, but it remains among the highest in the world, according to studies and other data.
In 2016, opioids of all kinds were linked to 42,249 deaths, up from the 33,091 reported in 2015. The opioid-related death rate jumped nearly 28% from the year before, according to the CDC, and the rate of deaths involving prescription opioids increased 11%.
Yet long-ingrained and freewheeling prescribing patterns changed little over the six years analyzed. KHN and Johns Hopkins examined the prescribing habits of all U.S. surgeons who frequently perform seven common surgical procedures and found that in the first week after surgery:
- Coronary artery bypass patients operated on by the highest-prescribing 1% of surgeons filled prescriptions in 2016 that exceeded an average of 105 opioid pills.
- Patients undergoing a far less painful procedure — a lumpectomy to remove a breast tumor — were given an average of 26 pills in 2016, with little variance from year to year. The highest-prescribing 5% of surgeons prescribed 40 to 70 pills on average.
- Some knee surgery patients took home more than 100 pills.
Those amounts — each “pill” in the analysis was the equivalent of 5 milligrams of oxycodone — are many times what is currently recommended by some physician groups to relieve acute pain, which occurs as a result of surgery, accident or injury. The analysis included only patients not prescribed opioids in the year before their operation.
“Prescribers should have known better” based on studies and other information available at the time, said Dr. Andrew Kolodny, co-director of opioid policy research at Brandeis University and director of the advocacy group Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing.
While the dataset included only prescriptions written for patients on Medicare, the findings may well understate the depth of the problem, since doctors are more hesitant to give older patients the powerful painkillers because of their sedating side effects.
Surgeons’ prescribing habits are significant because studies show that 6% of patients who are prescribed opioids after surgery will still be taking them three to six months later, having become dependent. The likelihood of persistent use rises with the number of pills and the length of time opioids are taken during recuperation.
Also, unused pills in medicine cabinets can make their way onto the street.
Dr. Marty Makary, a surgical oncologist at Johns Hopkins, admits that he too once handed out opioids liberally. Now he is marshaling a campaign to get surgeons to use these powerful painkillers more consciously and sparingly. “I think there’s an ‘aha’ moment that many of us in medicine have had or need to have,” he said.
But old habits are hard to kick.
Interactive: Look up surgeons’ opioid prescribing records
KHN contacted dozens of the surgeons who topped the ranks of opioid prescribers in the 2016 database. They hailed from small, community hospitals as well as major academic medical centers. The majority declined to comment, some bristling when questioned.
Some of those surgeons were critical of the analysis, saying it didn’t take into account certain essential factors. For example, it was not possible to determine whether patients had complications or needed higher amounts of pain medication for another reason. And some surgeons had only a handful of patients who filled prescriptions, making for a small sample size.
But surgeons also indicated that the way they prescribe pain pills was less than intentional. It was sometimes an outgrowth of computer programs that default to preset amounts following procedures, or practice habits developed before the opioid crisis. Additionally, they blame efforts in the late 1990s and early 2000s that encouraged doctors and hospitals to consider pain as “the fifth vital sign.” A major hospital accrediting group required providers to ask patients how well their pain was treated. Pharmaceutical companies used the fifth vital sign campaign as a way to promote their opioid treatments.
Makary, who oversaw the analysis of the Medicare dataset, said that, while opioid prescribing is slowly dropping, to date many surgeons have not paid enough attention to the problem or responded with sufficient urgency.
Indeed, Dr. Audrey Garrett, an oncologic surgeon in Oregon, said she was “surprised” to hear that she was among the top tier of prescribers. She said she planned to reevaluate her clinic’s automated prescribing program, which is set to order specific amounts of opioids.
KHN will analyze data for 2017 and subsequent years when it becomes available to follow how prescribing is changing.
Prescribing patterns highlight what’s at stake
The analysis examined prescribing habits after seven common procedures: coronary artery bypass, minimally invasive gallbladder removal, lumpectomy, meniscectomy (which removes part of a torn meniscus in the knee), minimally invasive hysterectomy, open colectomy, and prostatectomy.
Across the board, the analysis showed that physicians gave a large number of narcotics when fewer pills or alternative medications, including over-the-counter pain relief tablets, could be equally effective, according to recent guidelines from Makary and other academic researchers.
On average, from 2011 to 2016, Medicare patients in the analysis took home 48 pills in the week following coronary artery bypass; 31 following laparoscopic gallbladder removal; 28 after a lumpectomy; 41 after meniscectomy; 34 after minimally invasive hysterectomy; 34 after open colon surgery; and 33 after prostatectomy.
According to post-surgical guidelines spearheaded by Makary for his hospital last year, those surgeries should require at most 30 pills for bypass; 10 pills for minimally invasive gallbladder removal, lumpectomy, minimally invasive hysterectomy and prostatectomy; and eight pills for knee surgery. It has not yet published a guideline for open colon surgery.
The Hopkins doctors developed their own standards because of a dearth of national guidelines for post-surgical opioids. They arrived at those figures after reaching a consensus among surgeons, nurses, patients and other medical staff on how many pills were needed after particular surgeries.
Hoping to reduce overprescribing, Makary is preparing to send letters next month to surgeons around the country who are among the highest opioid prescribers under a grant he received from the Arnold Foundation, a nonprofit group whose focus includes drug price issues. (Kaiser Health News also received funding from the Arnold Foundation.)
Even if the prescription numbers have fallen since 2016, the amounts given today are likely still excessive.
“When prescribing may have been five to 20 times too high, even a reduction that is quite meaningful still likely reflects overprescribing,” said Dr. Chad Brummett, an anesthesiologist and associate professor at the University of Michigan.
Brummett is also co-director of the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network, a collaboration of physicians that makes surgery-specific recommendations, many of them in the 10- to 20-pill range.
“Reducing unnecessary exposure is key to reducing the risk of new addiction,” said former Food and Drug Administration commissioner Scott Gottlieb. In August 2018, when he was at the agency’s helm, it commissioned a report from the National Academy of Sciences on how best to set opioid prescribing guidelines for acute pain from specific conditions or surgical procedures. Its findings are expected later this year.
“There are still too many 30-tablet prescriptions being written,” said Gottlieb.
Healers sowing disease?
Naturally, surgeons rankle at the idea that they played a role in the opioid epidemic. But studies raise serious concerns.
Transplant surgeon Dr. Michael Engelsbe, director of the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, points to the study showing 6% of post-op patients who get opioids for pain develop long-term dependence. That means a surgeon who does 300 operations a year paves the way for 18 newly dependent people, he said.
Many patients do not need the amounts prescribed.
Intermountain Healthcare, a not-for-profit system of hospitals, clinics, and doctors in Utah, began surveying patients two years ago to find out how much of their prescribed supply of opioids they actually took following surgery.
“Globally, we were overprescribing by 50%,” said Dr. David Hasleton, senior medical director.
But Intermountain approached individual doctors carefully. “If you go to a prescriber to say, ‘You are overprescribing,’ it never goes well. A common reaction is, ‘Your data is wrong’ or ‘My patients are different than his,’” said Hasleton.
For the new analysis, KHN attempted to contact more than 50 surgeons whose 2016 numbers ranked them among the top 10 prescribers in each surgical category.
One who did agree to speak was Dr. Daniel J. Waters, who 13 years ago had his chest cut open to remove a tumor, an operation technically similar to what he does for a living: coronary artery bypass.
“So I have both the doctor perspective and the patient perspective,” said Waters, who practices in Mason City, Iowa.
In 2016, Waters’ Medicare bypass patients who filled their prescriptions took home an average of nearly 157 pills each, according to the KHN-Johns Hopkins analysis.
“When I went home from the hospital, 30 would not have been enough,” said Waters of the number recommended by the Hopkins team for that surgery.
But he said he has recently curbed his prescribing to 84 pills in the week after a heart bypass.
Nationally, the average prescription filled for a coronary artery bypass was 49 pills in 2016 and had changed little since 2011, the analysis shows.
Others who spoke with KHN said they had developed the habit of prescribing copiously — sometimes giving out multiple opioid prescriptions — because they didn’t want patients to get stuck far from the office or over a weekend with pain or because they were trying to avoid calls from dissatisfied, hurting patients.
In the KHN-Johns Hopkins data, the seven patients of Dr. Antonio Santillan-Gomez who filled opioid prescriptions after minimally invasive hysterectomies in 2016 received an average of 77 pills each.
A gynecologic oncologist, Santillan-Gomez said: “I’m in San Antonio, and some of my patients come from Laredo or Corpus Christi, so they would have to drive two to three hours for a prescription.”
Still, he said, since e-prescribing of opioids became more widespread in the past few years, he and other surgeons in his group have limited prescriptions to 20 to 30 pills and encouraged patients to take Tylenol or other over-the-counter medications if they run out. E-prescribing can not only help track patients getting opioids but also reduce the problem of patients having to drive back to the office to get a written prescription.
Dr. Janet Grange, a breast surgeon in Omaha, Neb., said that in her experience, opioid dependence had not been a problem.
“I can absolutely tell you I don’t have even 1% who become long-term opioid users,” said Grange.
The analysis showed that Grange had 12 opioid-naïve Medicare patients who had a lumpectomy in 2016. Eight of them filled prescriptions for an average of 47 pills per patient.
She called Johns Hopkins’ zero-to-10-pill pain-control recommendation following that procedure “miserly.”
The pendulum swings
Some of the higher-prescribing surgeons in the KHN-Johns Hopkins analysis reflected on their potential contribution to a national catastrophe and are changing their practice.
“That is a shocking number,” said oncologist Garrett, speaking of the finding that 6% of patients who go home with opioids will become dependent. “If it’s true, it’s something we need to educate physicians on much earlier in their medical careers.”
Garrett, in Eugene, Ore., said she has cut back on the number of pills she gives patients since 2016, when the KHN-Johns Hopkins analysis showed that seven of her 13 opioid-naïve Medicare patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies filled a prescription for opioids. Those patients took home an average of 76 pills each.
Johns Hopkins guidelines call for no more than 10 opioid pills following this procedure, while Brummett’s Michigan network recommends no more than 15.
Surgeon and researcher Dr. Richard Barth, once a heavy prescriber himself, said that his own experience convinced him that physicians’ preconceptions about how much pain relief is needed are often way off.
The analysis showed his lumpectomy patients in 2013 filled an average of 33 pills in the week after surgery. By 2016, that average had dropped to seven pills. Many patients, he said, can do just fine after lumpectomy with over-the-counter medications — and often no opioids at all.
The key, he said, is to set patients’ expectations upfront.
“I tell them it’s OK to have a little discomfort, that we’re not trying to get to zero pain,” said Barth, who is chief of general surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and has published extensively on opioid prescribing.
After lumpectomy, “what I recommend is Tylenol and ibuprofen for at least a few days and to use the opioids only if the discomfort isn’t relieved by those.”
Indeed, the data analysis showed that a significant number of patients given prescriptions for opioids never filled them because they don’t need that level of pain relief.
Between 2011 and 2016, for example, only 62% of lumpectomy patients in the analysis filled prescriptions, similar to hysterectomy patients.
In 2016, patients of Dr. Kimberli Cox, a surgeon in Peoria, Ariz., were prescribed about 59 pills in the week following lumpectomy, well above the recommendations from both Johns Hopkins and others.
But the KHN-Johns Hopkins analysis of that year’s data shows that half of her patients never filled a painkiller prescription — a fact she acknowledges and that has changed her thinking.
“I am now starting to prescribe less because many patients say, ‘You gave me too many’ or ‘I didn’t fill it,’” she said.
Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a nonprofit news service covering health issues. It is an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation that is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente. Julie Appleby can be reached at [email protected] and Elizabeth Lucas can be reached at [email protected]. On Twitter, they’re at @Julie_appleby and @eklucas.
Andrew Kolodny is the director of PROP who are known anti-opioid zealots with a huge conflict of interest. He is an addiction psychiatrist with no training in pain management yet he helped write the secretive CDC 2016 Guidelines (with no input from pain physicians, pain patients). He owns a huge chain of Addiction Treatment Centers in 9 states and receives millions in grants from the Federal Government. He is also heavily invested in Suboxone to replace the much cheaper methadone.
Doctors did NOT cause the false flag of the term “Opioid Epidemic”. We have what we’ve always had a “Heroin and illegal drugs coming over the border” problem! If you want to write a serious article about addiction start with that because until the media and the public UNDERSTAND that is the real battle they are fighting, addiction and the war on drugs will never go away! You will never win this battle until drugs are legalized like Portugal has done! The government is hyping this for money. It’s all about suing the drug manufacturers to replace the tobacco settlement money which has run out.
Dr. Lawhern, former director of The Alliance For Treatment Of Intractable Pain, is perhaps the best, most well researched, documented expert on pain and the detrimental effects of the CDC’S 2016 Guidelines. Google him on website Face Facts. I’m an Intractable Pain patient with CRPS, 20 years. These authors are completely clueless to the damage they are doing to pain patients by writing articles like this. I’m 68 and have seen it all. Nixon’s war on drugs, Trump’s war on drugs=war on pain patients and the plain fact is that the term “Opioid Epidemic” is a false flag for a problem we’ve always had, which is “A Heroin and Illegal Drugs Coming Over The Border Epidemic”! Legal prescription drugs were never the problem AND doctors “over-prescribing” causing the “Opioid Epidemic” is a big fat lie from Andrew Kolodny and PROP put out by the government.
The DEA could never win against the drug cartels, for a variety of reasons and they never will unless drugs are legalized like in Portugal. That’s unlikely to happen, therefore this addiction nightmare will always be with us, but now we’ve added another problem which is the torture and genocide by suicide of pain patients who are being denied opioids for pain! The DOJ pays bonuses to the DEA agents to check the Prescription Drug Monitoring Databases to find any doctor prescribing an opioid. With no warrant, they descend upon the office guns blazing, kicking down the door and seizing patient’s records violating the HIPPA ACT. The nurses and staff are threatened that if they don’t testify that the doctor is prescribing illegally they will go to prison along with the doctor (witness tampering). So the jury finds the doctor guilty and he/she goes to prison for 20-150 years, and the DEA gets paid again when they do a Civil Asset Forfeiture taking everything the doctor owns!
This reminds me of how the Gestapo worked in Hitler’s Germany. But the media is made up of very young people who were never taught history and so you have reporting like this.
Check out Abigail’s link. It is another eye-opener!
Thanks for the vote of confidence, Shirley. I have sent email to the authors of this piece, with a CC to the editor here at Stat News. I’ve provided them extensive references and some of my own papers which demonstrate beyond any reasonable contradiction that there is no cause and effect relationship between prescribing rates and rates of either opioid addiction or overdose mortality. Whether they will bother to read a strongly challenging narrative remains to be seen, of course.
For all others following this thread: those of you who are physically able may want to lobby your legislators, governors, Senators and Representative, Executive Directors of State Medical Boards, etc. For those physically able to do so, you may send me email at [email protected] to receive a package of briefing materials and stay-behind papers for use in educating both staffers and legislators themselves.
Keep on truckin’…
Any article using Andrew Kolodny, who has admitted he was paid $500,000 as a paid anti-opioid witness at the JnJ Oklahoma trial, as a “source” of facts is highly suspect. The article is made up of opinions and “many people say” stories that have no basis in a scientific analysis. STAT should take this article down.
Mr .Bolger,and ALLL thee others,,I agree,,,1000 %%,,kolodny has such a huge financial conflict of interest on this,,refuses the even meet w/truth to power advocates,Doctors etc,,This article should be pulled for propaganda and using,or should I say ABUSING,,the public trust,the medically ill,,for profit with this article..Every single ,”stat”they mention is corrupted research,,Pull thee article for non-truthful statements,,,maryw
The following extended extract was published in a white paper of the Alliance for the Treatment of Intractable Pain in March 2018
We … know from recently published, large-scale studies of surgical patients treated with opioids after discharge, that opioid abuse emerging from managed medical exposure is rare among patients who are profiled carefully before surgery. Millions of patients have such exposures every year.
A 2018 study reported in the British Medical Journal examined outcomes among more than 586,000 patients prescribed opioids for the first time after surgery. Less than 1% continued renewing their prescriptions longer than 13 weeks. 0.6% were later diagnosed with Opioid Abuse Disorder during follow-up periods averaging 2.6 years between 2008 and 2016. Likelihood of diagnosis increased with the length of prescriptions, but rose only modestly as dose levels increased from under 20 to over 120 MMED.
It is quite possible — even likely — that the diagnosis of Opioid Abuse Disorder in many of these patients was incorrect. The diagnosis is typically made by treating physicians who lack recourse to accepted definitions of the disorder such as the American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th edition. Many doctors who diagnose patients with abuse are general practitioners who lack sufficient training in addiction and have little experience evaluating the behaviors that actually define drug addiction. Likewise, some physicians confuse patient reports of emerging chronic pain – caused by failed surgery — for potential opioid abuse.
During the period of the study, doctors increasingly became concerned with being sanctioned by law enforcement authorities for their use of opioid doses high enough to reliably manage pain. Thus they may have diagnosed drug abuse to protect themselves – not their patients, who were often summarily discharged.
A 2016 study reported in the Journal of the American Medical Society tracked long-term opioid prescriptions in non-surgical patients, and compared prescription rates to 642,000 patients who received one of eleven common types of surgery. Opioid prescriptions were defined as “chronic” when 10 or more scripts were written in one year or a prescription was renewed continuously for more than 120 days.
In this study, the rate for chronic prescriptions of opioid analgesics among millions of non-surgical patients was estimated at 0.136 percent. (Parenthetically, this finding strongly suggests that “doctor shopping” is not a significant source of opioids abused by people with addiction.) For 4 of the 11 surgical procedures studied, the same rate of prescriptions occurred after surgery as before. For the seven remaining procedures, long-term opioid prescriptions rose by factors varying from 1.28 (0.174%) for caesarean delivery, up to 5.07 (0.69%) for total knee replacement.
The highest rate of post-surgical chronic prescriptions occurred for total knee replacement – a procedure known to cause lingering pain in many who undergo it. It is likely that many on-going prescriptions after knee replacement reflected chronic post-surgical pain, rather than issues of opioid misuse. Although not examined in the study, this outcome may also be true of other procedures where long-term prescribing was observed.
Nora D Volkow, MD, and Thomas A McLellan, Ph.D., “Opioid Abuse in Chronic Pain — Misconceptions and Mitigation Strategies” . NEMJ 2016; 374:1253-1263 March 31, 2016]. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1507771
Gabriel A Brat, Denis Agniel, Andrew Beam, Brian Yorkgitis, Mark Bicket, Mark Homer, Kathe P Fox, Daniel B Knecht, Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven, Nathan Palmer, Isaac Kohane, “Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study”, BMJ 2018;360:j5790
Eric C. Sun, Beth D. Darnall, Laurence C. Baker, Sean Mackey, “Incidence of and Risk Factors for Chronic Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naive Patients in the Postoperative Period”, JAMA Internal Medicine 2016;176(9):1286-1293.
It always amazes me,thee arrogance of some people..These authors must actually think,they have the right to decide for millions of surgery patients how much FORCED physical pain they are to endure,,according to them..Wow,,how grand it must be,to be the chosen ones eh?The ones who decide,who forcible suffers’ in forced physical pain via denial of effective dosage of opiate MEDICINE,.Back in the days of humane care and common sense,,medical torture,,would be frowned upon,,,but not by authors like these.Who have used their poisen pens of propaganda to decide,who forcible suffers in physical pain from medical conditions,and who does not,via their agenda to promote opiatephobia.U know the AMA , is currently collecting true data on all who have been forced to endure physical pain from any medicasl condition via those,who like you all,think they have the right to decide,how much a medically ill human being is to forcible suffer in physical pain..Good luck,,when your next surgery comes,or your next painful medical condition comes along,,For I hear their now doing double mastectomies’ w/no opiate medicine.C-sections w/no opiate medicines..and baby aspirins for amputation…All because of folks like you,who think they have a right to decide,how much,,a person should suffer in physical pain.Heck in Western Canada,,you’d be arrested for torture..as it appears every other country but America,,seems to abide by the U.N doctrine of no medical torture allowed in the healthcare setting….jmo,,maryw
Note the authors are not with Kaiser Permanente.
It has NO positive value.
Has anyone ever wondered how the so many in the medical community are ignorant about addiction vs dependence? Well it turns out there is a very good reason for that. Some one from HHS gave me this link.
Comments are closed.