The World Health Organization declared the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo a global health emergency on Wednesday, a move that is likely to escalate international attention on a crisis that has flared for a year despite aggressive efforts to stamp it out.

The declaration, which critics have contended is long overdue, could increase the amount of funding and assistance other countries are willing to provide to the response effort.

But if the experience of the West African Ebola outbreak of 2014-2016 is any indication, it could also lead to border closings, trade restrictions, cancellations of flights, and the suspension of visas to people from the DRC.

advertisement

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who declared the public health emergency of international concern — known as a PHEIC — on the recommendation of a panel of outside experts, stressed that any type of travel or trade restriction would impede the effort to extinguish the outbreak and hurt the economies of the countries in the region.

“The government of DRC is doing everything they can,” said Tedros, as he is known. “They need the support of the international community. … That includes its financial support.”

The WHO and its partners in the containment effort have struggled to stop this outbreak, the second largest on record. There have been more than 2,500 cases and close to 1,700 deaths.

They have also struggled to raise the funding needed to finance the operation, and have warned recently that the lack of funds is actually limiting what can be done on the ground.

“WHO is not aware of any donor that has withheld funding because a PHEIC had not been declared,” the director general said. “But if that was the excuse, it can no longer be used.”

The various partners in the outbreak response are currently finalizing a strategic plan — the fourth of this outbreak. Final figures haven’t been set but Tedros warned it will run to the hundreds of millions of dollars. Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s emergencies program, said the cost of the public health portion of the operation alone will likely be in excess of $233 million.

Mercy Corps, one of the NGOs working on the outbreak response, said it hoped the declaration of a PHEIC would translate into more support for the work that needs to be done in DRC.

“Every day, women, men, and children are dying of the Ebola virus and it is becoming too easy to forget that the ever-climbing case numbers are people,” said Laura Miller, Mercy Corps’ acting country director for the DRC.

The decision was applauded by some global health experts who have been frustrated by the fact it wasn’t taken earlier.

“Almost all international legal and policy experts agree that the conditions for declaring a PHEIC were met long ago, so we are delighted to see that the emergency committee and the director-general have finally come to this decision,” said Rebecca Katz, director of the Center for Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University. “Not only do we believe that the decision will help bring additional needed attention to this ongoing crisis, but also move nations in the regions to take all necessary steps to address the potential spread of the disease.”

Though calls for the declaration of a PHEIC have become deafening as the length of this outbreak has dragged on, it was not entirely clear Wednesday when the advisory panel — called an emergency committee — finally relented and recommended the declaration. The committee had eschewed that path on three earlier occasions, including most recently in June, after three infected people from DRC crossed the border into Uganda.

All three were isolated quickly; all three died from their illness. There were no secondary infections from those cases.

Professor Robert Steffen, chair of the emergency committee, said the decision to conclude that a PHEIC is now warranted was based on several factors — the resurgence of transmission in Beni, a city that had been a hotspot early in the outbreak; the continued risk to Ebola response workers (two were recently murdered); the fact that nearly a year into the outbreak transmission is occurring over a wide swath of territory; and the discovery of a case in Goma.

Most of those factors were also true in June when the committee voted not to recommend a PHEIC. But Margaret Harris, the WHO’s communications manager for the Ebola response in DRC, said the committee felt the outbreak had reached a tipping point, with transmission occurring over an increasing large geographic area.

It remains to be seen if that will include Goma, a city of 2 million people south of the outbreak zone. Goma is on the border with Rwanda and is a regional travel hub; it’s long been feared it could serve as a launching pad for a much larger outbreak.

A pastor who was infected recently traveled by bus from Butembo to Goma, encountering a large number of people on his way. The pastor has since died.

Ryan said so far 257 people who either were in contact with the man, or in contact with his contacts, have been vaccinated in Goma. To date no other infections have been diagnosed there, but there would be no surprise if this case triggered other infections in the city.

There is also the possibility of additional cases in Uganda. On Wednesday, the country’s health minister announced an infected woman from DRC crossed into Uganda to trade for fish; she later returned to DRC, where she died. Authorities are looking for people who were in contact with her while she was in Uganda so they can be vaccinated.

Since the start of the outbreak last August, nearly 164,000 people have been vaccinated with an experimental Ebola vaccine being developed by Merck. While the WHO credits the vaccine for preventing a larger disaster, the outbreak response has struggled to find a way to bring this outbreak to an end.

The outbreak is occurring in a part of DRC that has been a conflict zone for decades. A United Nation peacekeeping force operates in the area and has had to provide security for outbreak responders who have come under attack from people in the region, some of whom believe Ebola was brought to the region by the outsiders.

Seven people working on the response have been killed, teams trying to conduct safe burials to prevent transmission have been attacked, and Ebola treatment centers have been fire bombed. The violence and the distrust has sharply impeded the outbreak responders’ ability to bring the outbreak under control and it’s not clear at this point what will swing the trajectory toward a conclusion of the outbreak.

This marks only the fifth time the WHO has declared a public health emergency of international concern. The previous PHEICs were the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, and the Zika outbreak in Latin America in 2016. Setbacks in the polio eradication effort in 2014 led WHO to declare the spread of wild poliovirus a public health emergency; that PHEIC remains in place today.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • I suggest the DRC put an end to the violence it’s people are engaged in. Hard to help a people who would rather murder the helpers then accept their help. Also, money should not be a consideration in containing this disease, borders should be closed, trade curtailed.

  • The WHO has taken far too long to make this decision, while Ebola has spread further, costing more lives every day. I hope the drastic but necessary measure is taken to quarantaine the whole DRC. That is the only solution for a hyper-recalcitrant population that just runs wild, carrying Ebola everywhere. This spread MUST be stopped, no matter how harsh the methods might need to be. If prolonged waffling and luke-warm measures continue, the disaster’s magnitude will just amplify 1000-fold. Accollades to nations like Uganda that grab the bull by the horns, and do the real spread control – that most certainly the WHO should enforce.
    And “leaders” in the DRC who do not support whatever available Ebola vaccinations are being offered are useless simpletons who need to be overruled, even if force is required. This is not a DRC problem, this is a problem for the entire world, and requires protection for the whole world.

    • Mary F.,
      I wonder what country or part of the world you live in with your expressed view that the “whole of DRC should be quarantined” to end an epidemic. Your statement that the population in DRC is “hyper-recalcitrant…that just runs wild, carrying Ebola everywhere,” is obviously based on the colonialist western mentality and ignorance.

      Perhaps you should read more on Ebola in DRC, where it was first officially diagnosed in 1976 and where they have had 6 smaller Ebola epidemics (before this one), that were contained and controlled by highly trained medical and public health specialists (including epidemiologists, biologists and virologist), who were all citizens of the DRC. It is most likely that you never heard of this.
      These very specialist came to Liberia at the height of the West African Ebola epidemic to provide expertise in developing strategies to end what was the worst Ebola epidemic in history (2014 -2016).
      These people you call “hyper-recalcitrant…..spreading Ebola everywhere” often distrust expatriates who supposedly “come to help” because of people like you and the views you’ve expressed. AND, once an Ebola vaccine was produced and available, this 7th outbreak has escalated far beyond the previous 6 and people fear they are being used as part of a vaccination experiment. Similar situations of distrust occurred in West Africa.
      So, I suggest you learn more and be respectful of people less educated or as privileged as you might be, given their very desperate situations. Think and learn before you speak or put your pen to paper.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy