After a year of intense lobbying, the Trump administration on Monday finalized federal rules to give patients easier electronic access to their medical records and fuel a freer exchange of health data to improve their care.

The president’s top aides characterized the implementation of the rules as a watershed moment in American health care, unlocking health information that is now inaccessible to patients and technology companies seeking to use it to develop digital products and services.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
  • Any Discussion Concerning “Privacy” Regarding Patients Medical Records AKA HippA Would Be Laughable If This Weren’t So Opposite The Truth. Especially People Receiving Medicare/Caid And Disabled. Prior To 911 And All That Changed Since Then Is Enough To Make My Head Ache. There Isn’t ANY “Privacy” At All. Worse Yet Is That We Are Being Lied To, Exploited, And Used As Lab Rats With “Medications” Which Are Nonstandardized, Toxic, And Mislabeled Which Keeps Us Stuck On This Broken And Corrupt System.

  • OK. For 20 yesrs I’ve jumped through many hoops to forward my translational research. IRBs, MTAs, consent, etc. what exactly is changed by this? Informed consent has been rigorously interpreted and implemented. You can’t be induced to consent. You can’t be consented when undergoing surgery lest it be seen as making treatment conditional on consenting. It seems as if a back door is opening onto the stage pf clinical research – one with lower hurdles. It is unreasonable to give access to HIPPA identifiers via an easy low hurdles route (think Google) and the traditional high hurdles route (think traditional academic and clinical research). I don’t get it.

Comments are closed.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy