Contribute Try STAT+ Today

With Europe and the United States locked in deadly battle with the coronavirus that causes Covid-19, a number of countries that were hit early by the virus are doing a far better job of beating it back.

China, which is now diagnosing more cases in returning travelers than in people infected at home, reported no new domestically acquired cases on Wednesday, for the first time in more than two months. South Korea, which had an explosive outbreak that began in February, is aggressively battering down its epidemic curve. Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have together reported only about 600 cases.

Those successes have been bought by a layering of what are known as non-pharmaceutical initiatives — including social distancing and travel restrictions — aimed at severing chains of transmission to keep the virus from going into an exponential growth cycle.


Support STAT: If you value our coronavirus coverage, please consider making a one-time contribution to support our journalism.

None of the other countries has been as aggressive as China, which put tens of millions of people into forced quarantine for weeks. And these other locales have not all adopted an across-the-board checklist of measures. While kids in Hong Kong haven’t been in school since late January, class continues in Singapore.

Here’s a look at some of the techniques these governments employed, and how they stack up to steps being taken in the United States as well as the United Kingdom, which has come under heavy scrutiny for its approach, fairly or not.


Let’s start with Singapore.

The island city-state was one of the first places to ban incoming flights from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the virus originated. And it placed people coming into the country from countries affected by Covid-19 into mandatory quarantine.

Singapore has seen its numbers gradually tick up. But it hasn’t had an explosion of cases, likely because it has aggressively tracked where the virus was circulating. Of the 345 cases it has recorded, 124 have recovered and 221 are considered active cases. It has not yet recorded a death.

“Singapore has done everything right,” said David Heymann, who led the World Health Organization’s response to the 2003 SARS outbreak and now teaches infectious diseases epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. “They’ve been openly communicating every day on what’s going on. And they’ve made it clear to the population and the population understands that they are not only to protect themselves but protect others.”

Health authorities have severed several transmission chains, tracking down people who have been in contact with a known case and ordering them into home quarantine. They are checked twice daily to see if they developed a fever.

Mass gatherings were canceled. Schools have not been closed, though students go through temperature screening to enter. So does anyone entering most buildings or restaurants.

Heymann, who was in Singapore recently to lecture at Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, said at the start of each class, a picture would be taken of the classroom, so that if any student became ill, there would be a record of who had been in close contact with him or her. “So there’s all kinds of innovations and measures going on,” he told STAT.

Singapore also quickly developed a much-needed serology test — a blood test used to look for antibodies in blood that are a sign of previous infection. Getting a handle on how many people have been infected is critical to understanding how deadly this virus really is, experts stress. Authorities in Singapore actually used the serology test in late February to find the source of a cluster of cases in a church group.

How about Hong Kong?

Hong Kong, like Taiwan and Singapore, bears deep psychological scars from the 2003 SARS outbreak. Hong Kong had the most cases of the disease outside of mainland China and people there remember the trauma that came with it.

So do their public health leaders, who have prepared for disruptive infectious diseases outbreaks in the years since SARS and the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic. People take respiratory health hygiene seriously, routinely wearing surgical masks in public if they are sick to prevent spread to others.

“These places were better equipped to face an outbreak of the new coronavirus than many others,” Ben Cowling, a professor of infectious diseases epidemiology, and Wey Wen Lim, a graduate student in infectious disease epidemiology at the University of Hong Kong, wrote in a recent opinion piece in the New York Times.

Hong Kong responded very quickly — within days of China’s Dec. 31 announcement that it was finding unusual cases of pneumonia. Doctors were told to report any patient who had influenza-like illness and a travel history to Wuhan. Borders crossings into China were closed — first some, then all.

Schools and universities haven’t been open since the Lunar New Year, on Jan. 23, though online learning has replaced classroom teaching in some circumstances.

Hong Kong has been testing for the virus, aggressively trying to locate cases. People have been urged to telework if possible and to practice social distancing.

Gabriel Leung, dean of medicine at the University of Hong Kong, said measures have largely worked, but the toll is high. And both he and Cowling are concerned people are starting to let down their guard.

“I think we are already beginning to see a little bit of response fatigue among the people,” Leung said, noting it has become apparent over the past couple of weeks. “You see that people are beginning to mix again, they’re beginning to come out again, because it’s been two months already. So how do you still keep alert and keep this up? There is only so much that any population would be able to tolerate.”

What of Taiwan?

Taiwan didn’t move initially to cut off air travel with Wuhan, as Singapore did. But doctors boarded incoming flights with temperature scanners looking for people who were unwell. Later it did ban most flights from China.

Mass gatherings were not banned, but were discouraged. The government controlled the distribution and pricing of medical masks, Cowling and Lim wrote. Stiff fines — up to more than $30,000 — were threatened for people who violated home quarantine orders.

“All of these places are coupling aggressive testing strategies to identify cases, with isolation, contact tracing and sometimes quarantine of at-risk people,” said Caitlin Rivers, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, speaking of Singapore, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and South Korea. “And they have also layered on community mitigation strategies, school closures … and other closures. So what I take away from that is that it’s important to layer these strategies to try to accommodate both of them.”

Rivers tried to look at whether the measures were being successful at driving down new infection rates by pulling up data on other types of communicable infections, both respiratory illnesses, diarrheal diseases, and conjunctivitis. In a short analysis she posted on Twitter, Rivers noted that rates of these other infections declined after stringent social distancing practices were put into place.

“The things that are also spread through close contact have fallen dramatically, and so that tells me it’s individual-level social distancing behavior that is contributing to the control,” she said.

Isn’t South Korea a different case?

Indeed, the Republic of Korea has had a different trajectory than Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore.

The new coronavirus took root in a large and closely knit religious sect, a development that led to an explosive outbreak, which the other three have not experienced. As of Wednesday South Korea has reported just over 8,400 cases and 91 deaths.

But whereas Western countries that have reached numbers like those see daily and every larger rises in their case counts, South Korea’s outbreak curve has been beaten back. From a one-day high of 909 new cases on Feb. 29, South Korea has seen its daily case count rise by as few as 74 cases on Monday. That swung back up, though, on Thursday to 152.

The country is testing aggressively — more than a quarter of a million people had been tested by March 15, Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha told the BBC recently.

“Testing is central because that leads to early detection. It minimizes further spread and it quickly treats those found with the virus,” she said, suggesting early detection and treatment may explain why South Korea’s death rate is lower than other places with large numbers of cases.

South Korea introduced drive-through testing, allowing people to be checked for disease without even leaving their vehicles. Travelers returning from abroad have to provide contact information and report their health status for 14 days after their return via a mobile app, the South Korea CDC website reports.

It has recommended Koreans refrain from international travel at this time and urged people to avoid large gatherings and church services. Companies have been encouraged to allow workers who are able to work from home.

Can these techniques be applied elsewhere? Is it too late in places like the United Kingdom and the United States?

Many epidemiologists and mathematical modelers who have been plotting the possible trajectory of this pandemic think there is no choice but to try some of the serious social distancing measures other countries have taken.

But Marc Lipsitch, an infectious diseases epidemiologist at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said the possibility of containment — stopping spread — through rigorous tracing of all contacts of known cases is not realistic. That window has closed, he said.

“I think one thing to learn from those experiences is that what’s appropriate when an epidemic is small and mostly ascertained is not appropriate when an epidemic is large and mostly not ascertained,” he said.

“I would say put in place as intense as possible social distancing and get the messaging from the White House consistent with that,” Lipsitch said. “Right away, everywhere, with the short-term goal of trying to reduce the … demand on the health care system.”

Any universities still in session should send students home, especially those living in dormitories “which are one step away from cruise ships in terms of density and poor ventilation,” he said.

Lipsitch said time is limited to make a difference.

“The data that we just assembled from Wuhan about the timing and magnitude of the peak demand for critical care shows first that it can very quickly — even without that many people being infected compared to the whole population — exceed per capita bed capacity in the United States,” Lipsitch said.

He noted there was a four-week lag between the shutdown of Wuhan and the overwhelming of critical care units. “So if you wait till you see a problem, then you have another month of agony, at least.”

It appeared that was the kind of message Britain was not heeding.

There was a huge controversy late last week when it seemed like the country intended to simply allow enough people to become infected so that the population would develop “herd immunity.”

Adam Kucharski, an associate professor of infectious diseases epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said it was never the government’s plan to drive toward herd immunity; rather, there was an acknowledgment that might be what happens because the virus could be so hard to control.

“It’s not been an aim to get everyone infected as soon as possible. It’s more this really tough situation we’ve got where the options we have are probably not going to be able to fully control this in the long term,” Kucharski said.

The country has now taken a swing toward the types of early and aggressive social distancing methods other countries are trying to implement. The government is urging people with even mild symptoms to self-isolate; but Kucharski worried that message was going unheard in the din about herd immunity.

The country, he said, was trying to save some of the more difficult measures — really stringent social distancing approaches that are hard to sustain over time — for closer to when they are needed.

“It makes sense to use them, given that they’re short-term measures, use them when they’ve got the most impact,” Kucharski said. “You can’t shut down your country for months.”

Rivers suggested that was a risky approach. “I think that’s a difficult thing to time. My recommendations for the U.S. context at least, is to begin social distancing measures early,” she said.

In the United States, a tepid early response — marked by a prolonged delay in ramping up testing and a White House that initially seemed intent on playing down the scale of the threat — has given way to a war footing.

This week the White House urged Americans to embrace social distancing by not taking part in gatherings of more than 10 people. In a number of communities, restaurants are closed to all but takeout or delivery service. Some states have closed schools. The country is on edge.

But with large-scale testing capacity still coming up to speed, it remains unclear how deeply the virus has embedded itself into the country, and whether the measures people and their local, state, and national governments are trying to adopt can slow the coronavirus’ progress.

It is also unclear how long communities can sustain the dramatic lifestyle changes that appear to be needed to slow the virus’s spread.

“Right now people are approaching this if they are basically sheltering in place for … a Minneapolis blizzard, lasting two or three days. And that’s the mindset that they have. Where, in fact, we need to look at this like a coronavirus winter, where we’re only in the first weeks of what could be a long season,” warned Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Diseases Research and Policy.

“This could last easily many months. And we need to make our actions proportional to the risk in the community or else we run the risk of people just getting tired of them when that particular community has not seen increased transmission of the virus.”

This article had been corrected. An earlier version misidentified the Singapore university at which David Heymann lectured.

  • I think there is one important thing that you don’t see much reported in these cases per country studies, that is each country social behavior habits. The most striking to me is Italy which today has more death than China. It is important to know that Italian families have a habit of keeping their elders at home with them.Everybody is in the same home. Knowing that this Coronavirus is more deadly to the older people one can easily see that the spread within their own homes is affecting Italian families more than in other occidental countries. France will be interesting to watch because people here have a habit of promiscuity as for exemple shaking hands with everybody and cheeks to cheeks kisses. For exemple one would shake hands with every male coworker every morning and kiss on the cheek every female coworker. It’s si bad that if you don’t people will think that you have a problem with them.I would shake hands and kiss on the cheeks 100 person a day. While in the US or European Nordic countries people only salute each other from far away. Having worked many years in the US, Great Britain, Sweden and France I can testify that there is a huge behavioral difference which I think should and will impact the final results even if each of these countries take similar measures in the fight against that killer virus.

  • I’m praying that we’re put on mandatory quarantine, as young people are completely oblivious. When I tell my teenagers there’s an epidemic, the say I’m “effin crazy.” They go to the store, come home, absolutely refuse to wash hands. Only a government order can stop them from infecting parents and grandparents.

    • Adam, it is time to slap your offspring into shape, if all else fails. Not listening and being anti-social disease spreaders putting everyone else at risk is 100% unacceptable. You are writing a lot, maybe you should re-focus your attention to your brood.

  • Lipstich has already been proven wrong by the experiment in Vo Italy, which eliminated covid19 by contact tracing . Not all areas are affected similarly at the same time. European and American communities at early stage of the pandemic can reduce the toll by contact tracing. Many would still be at the stage HK, Taiwan, Singapore and Korea was when China was devastated.

  • My state has no mandatory quarantine. My teenagers are everywhere. I’m older, so I’m basically at their mercy. As long as there is no mandatory quarantine, my wife and are are much more likely to be infected, and there’s nothing we can do about it.

  • The comment about how the USA handled this is not fair or accurate. I’ve been watch the press conference and the CDC and others praising the White House for the swift actions.

    • The White House is catching up on this, but make no mistake that we’re in catch-up mode. South Korea is doing more tests for the virus per day than we have for pretty much the whole epidemic. We literally have no idea where it is reliably, and our only indicator is that our tests are showing linear growth.

      Since we know the growth is expontential, that just means we know that the actual numbers are somewhere higher than our testing. Could be 5x, 10x, 50x, etc. And then recall that 10-20% of those will be in the hospital in a few weeks. We are probably about to be overwhelmed like Italy within the month, we just don’t know where or when because we’re flying half-blind.

      That isn’t to fault the White House. We’ve had 3 presidents since SARS in 2003, and nobody put much effort into getting good plans or resources for stopping a major epidemic. But our actions definitely have not been swift and our first action was a faceplant (developing our own defective test, rather than using the existing WHO test) which uncovered a regulatory failure (not allowing labs to use their own tests other than the CDC’s failure). Many thousands of additional people may die due to those mistakes.

  • People in Hongkong , Taiwan and Korea wear mask when healthy to protect not just when sick. For cultural reasons European and Americans don’t. But social distancing is not always possible in cities, eg in trains buses elevators shopping etc. Western societies tend to underestimate the value of mask despite having no evidence it is not useful in urban environment during a contagious disease attack.
    Time doctors do a proper trial.

    • Agree wholeheartedly. I find it STAGGERING that the West is happy to write off China’s clinical test results as not methodologically robust enough and so insists on re-inventing the wheel but happily insists masks have no protective value on the basis of no robust, peer reviewed study I can see.

      Fact: If you have COVID-19 and are hospitalised they provide you with a mask so your risk for spread through droplet by coughing and sneezing is reduced.

      If everybody wears a mask, infected people (even if they don’t know it) will be putting less viral load out to nearby people through coughing and sneezing and less viral load on their hands by touching their nose/mouth.

      Let’s face it. The real reason they don’t suggest wearing masks is because leaders in the West were too lazy and incompetent to stockpile masks for the general population!

  • The blunder that CDC did on testing is unforgivable. The windows to contain cover-19 had pass because of their blunder and the government downplaying copied 19 in the beginning. Even telling people to live their lives same as before. Telling people not to wear mask if they are sick. Telling people not to get tested if they are not showing symptoms. All of these are opposite to what the countries who are successful did.

    We don’t need the government money. We need government to test as much people as they can. Asymptomatic celebrities and athlete are getting tested but critical patients are getting ignore. Trumph response is that is life. That is the reality of life, but I hope each governors or CDC enact a more fairer rule.

    Time as an article titled ” Can’t get tested, maybe you are in the wrong country”.
    It shows which country got it right and how the western countries committed blunder after blunder at the cost of their citizen lives.

  • With 20% of cases serious and out of that 20%, 6% critical. 63% of health care workers in Wuhan got infected, It’s easy to see where it’s headed.

    Just the above tells you everything, you don’t have to be a doctor or scientist. But some reason the world needs experts to explain what does not need explaining, no pun towards the experts. This is the real issue, I don’t understand this, maybe I’m getting too old at almost 50.

    Oh and Australia’s idea of social distancing on Bondi beach yesterday, and here we have an incredibly low count of cases and could easily do what China did and be fully recovered in 2-3 months.

    Couple 1000 at the beach?

  • The main problem with Britain’s initial temporary experiment with herd immunity, is that they did not emphasize protecting the vulnerable/elderly/sick part of the herd. They should be isolated for 3 weeks, during which time, the young and healthy should be innoculated with the virus; they will experience a mild illness and develope immunity. They will then become shields to protect the vulnerable by denying the virus of many vectors. So I think a combination of strict quarantine for the susceptible, and the equivalent of chicken pox parties for the young would be the fastest way to get past this epidemic with the fewest fatalities. Even with social distancing, eventually most of the population gets the disease.

    • Absolutely correct. Quarantine the old and sick and let the others get the virus to build up immunity.

  • Kinsa makes electronic, web-connected thermometers. They have an elevated temperature map. Of course, still tangled up with the flu, but Florida not looking good.

Comments are closed.