
A candidate vaccine for Covid-19 developed by the drug maker Moderna appears to generate an immune response similar to the response seen in people who have been infected by the virus and recovered, the company said Monday.
In a Phase 1 trial, eight patients who received two doses of the vaccine at the lowest and middle doses tested — 25 and 100 micrograms — developed neutralizing antibodies to the virus at levels similar to people who had recovered from infection, the company said in a statement.
The data were limited and from only a small number of participants in the trial, led by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. But they are still likely to be seen as encouraging. Research aimed to develop a vaccine against SARS, a related virus responsible for a 2002-2003 outbreak, showed that neutralizing antibodies are pivotal for achieving protection.
advertisement
Moderna is developing the vaccine in conjunction with the NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center.
“These interim Phase 1 data, while early, demonstrate that vaccination with mRNA-1273 elicits an immune response of the magnitude caused by natural infection starting with a dose as low as 25 μg,” said Tal Zaks, Moderna’s chief medical officer.
advertisement
The statement noted that a new arm of the trial is being established to test a 50-microgram dose, which may suggest concern that the 25-microgram dose may be too low.
As the vaccine’s developers work to establish a dose, they must balance the need to achieve protection in individuals — including seniors, who are at highest risk in this pandemic but whose immune systems do not respond as well to vaccines — with the goal of using as little vaccine as possible per person to stretch out what will be limited supplies.
“I think 25 [micrograms] gets us there but you always want to have somewhat of a margin,” Zaks told STAT in an interview.
“The sense is at the end of the day we’re going to narrow it down on somewhere between 25 and 100,” he said. “It’s going to be really hard math for us.”
While some experts wanted more detail before commenting on the data, others saw it as a positive sign for this vaccine.
“The neutralizing antibody and safety results from the Phase 1 clinical study are promising for the Moderna mRNA vaccine candidate and supportive to proceed forward with the planned Phase 2 studies,” Robin Robinson, chief scientific officer at RenovaCare, told STAT. Robinson is a former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
Vaccination with the candidate vaccine, provisionally labeled mRNA-1273, also prevented viral replication in the lungs of mice in preclinical testing, the company’s statement said.
A Phase 2 trial has already been given the go-ahead by the Food and Drug Administration. CEO Stéphane Bancel said the company is pushing forward with a Phase 3 trial set to start in July and is ramping up its capacity to manufacture the vaccine.
“We are investing to scale up manufacturing so we can maximize the number of doses we can produce to help protect as many people as we can from SARS-CoV-2,” Bancel said, referring to the virus that causes Covid-19.
The company’s statement suggested the vaccine was well-tolerated in people who received it in the Phase 1 dosing trial. One of the people in the 100-microgram arm developed redness at the injection site that met the criteria for a Grade 3 adverse event. And three volunteers in the highest dose arm — 250 micrograms — developed Grade 3 systemic reactions after receiving the second of two doses. There were no Grade 4 or life-threatening adverse events recorded in the trial.
The early readout included arms of the trial involving people ages 18 to 55 years old who received either two doses at the 25 microgram or 100 microgram level or one dose at 250 microgram. There were 45 people involved in these three arms, though neutralizing antibody data are only available at this point for the first four patients each of the 25 microgram and 100 microgram cohorts.
People who received two doses at the 25 microgram level developed binding antibodies at levels consistent with those seen in the blood of people who have recovered from Covid-19 infection, the statement said. People who received two doses at 100 microgram had binding antibody levels that “significantly exceeded” the levels seen in the blood of Covid-19 survivors.
What is reaction of vaccine. Short term and long term. Time is although needed for side effects observation and depending on age range groups.
Helen how is 20% of those that received the 250 level dose getting a Grade 3 event a good outcome!! According to the FDA Grade 3 is “Severe & Medically Significant.” But you say the vaccine was well tolerated! That’s crazy.
This is not promising at all. Four out of 45 developed neutralizing antibodies? And given the history of disease enhancement (when the vaccinated are met with the wild virus and develop more severe symptoms because of the vaccine) with rna vaccines, this finding in this tiny trial is lipstick on a pig. People are desperate for hope, but this is a nightmare.
“There were 45 people involved in these three arms, though neutralizing antibody data are only available at this point for the first four patients each of the 25 microgram and 100 microgram cohorts.”
No more vaccines!!!! My goodness!!!!
Stupid whore
Is there evidence that antibody production prevents disease? Will this be tested by tracking disease incidence of recipients versus comparable unvaccinated populations? Won’t this take some time?
Of course there won’t be such comparisons (between vaccinated and unvaccinated). There isn’t any such study even with the current schedule of approved vaccines. And no one knows how long antibodies for COVID are protective. Everyone is guessing and dying for hope. They’re willing to skip animal trials and go straight to human challenge trials. This is madness where the cure is worse than the disease.
I am 68 if you want to trial me
I from Pakistan
Thank you
Regards
Regards
I want informationI want to be a volunteer
Excellent results! Go straight forward! Was it difficult to get FDA approval?
Judging by many responses: the readership is deteriorating.
Helen, I’m wondering why you failed to mention Anthony Fauci in this story as he is the director of NIAID?