Biologist David Liu was in the middle of his morning commute to the Broad Institute two summers ago when he opened the email. We just discovered a new toxin made by bacteria, explained the note from a researcher Liu had never spoken to, and it “might be useful for something you guys do.”

Intrigued, Liu phoned the sender, biologist Joseph Mougous of the University of Washington, and it quickly became clear that the bacterial toxin had a talent that was indeed useful for what Liu does: invent ways to edit genes. On Wednesday, they and their colleagues reported in Nature that they had turned the toxin into the world’s first editor of genes in cell organelles called mitochondria.

If all goes well, the discovery could provide a way to study and, one day, cure a long list of rare but devastating inherited diseases resulting from genetic mutations in the cell’s power plant.


“We’ve been looking for a technology like this for a very long time,” said biologist Fyodor Urnov of the University of California’s Innovative Genomics Institute, who reviewed the paper for Nature. “We’ve been able to make point mutations” — changing a single letter of DNA — “in human nuclear DNA for 15 years, but mitochondria have resisted that furiously, much to the great frustration of everybody. With this technology, mitochondrial research will enter a golden age.”

The hundreds of capsule-shaped mitochondria inside every cell turn oxygen and nutrients into the chemical energy that powers a cell’s metabolism. Mitochondria also metabolize cholesterol and synthesize hormones and neurotransmitters. If one of their 37 genes is aberrant, mitochondria can’t perform, resulting in any of hundreds of mitochondrial diseases. The most devastating, including “mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome” (MDDS), destroy children’s muscles and brains, and eventually take their lives.


The genome editing revolution has largely passed mitochondria by. CRISPR doesn’t work: The guide RNA it uses like a bloodhound to find its target within a genome can’t penetrate mitochondrial walls. Earlier editors, such as TALENs, can eliminate mutations in mitochondria in cells growing in lab dishes, but only by destroying the DNA. Nothing couldnfix mutations by changing one DNA letter into another, such as a C to a T or a G to an A.

“Mitochondria,” said Liu, “are one of the last bastions of DNA that has resisted precision genome editing.”

Mougous’ email suggested a way around that resistance. He studies the chemical warfare that bacteria wage against other bacteria. The chemical weapon he’d just discovered, secreted by Burkholderia cenocepacia bacteria, is an enzyme that infiltrates an enemy bacterium and kills with lethal simplicity: It causes single-letter genetic mutations in a bacterium’s double-stranded DNA. At every targeted spot, it leaves the bacterial DNA in tatters. The bacterium dies. Mission accomplished.

Mougous, like Liu a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator, knew Liu had invented a breakthrough form of CRISPR, one that changes only a single DNA letter, and does so without cutting the double helix, which can lead to genomic havoc. Called “base editing,” this technology has already spawned one biotech and is marching toward human studies.

His novel bacterial toxin, Mougous thought, sure looked like a base editor; it changes the nucleotide pair CG into a TA. And it doesn’t require a guide RNA (the chaperone that can’t penetrate mitochondria).

Liu’s first question, on a phone call that began in an Uber and continued into the Broad’s lobby, was: Aren’t bacterial toxins, um, toxic? “If this thing ran rampant inside human cells,” he recalled thinking, “you’d probably have the same consequences as with the bacteria warfare: The cell would be dead. I asked, how are you going to tame the beast?”

Liu’s graduate student Beverly Mok figured out how. Splitting the enzyme, called a deaminase, into two harmless halves kept it from killing cells. But half an enzyme isn’t a genome editor. So Mok fused each half to proteins that find their way to specific regions of mitochondrial DNA. There, the halves reassembled (this was all in lab dishes) and did their thing: precisely editing the target DNA.

Like Liu’s first CRISPR base editors, this one has a mediocre efficiency. When the scientists aimed it at five genes in human mitochondria, it edited roughly 20% to 40% of its targets by three to six days.

“There is room for improvement,” Urnov said, “but the history of this field tells us that something that starts at 20% efficiency can, with technical optimization, get to 80% and above.”

And just as the first base editors, which could only change a C to a T and a T to an A, were quickly joined by those able to change A to G and T to C, so the mitochondrial base editor should soon be joined by cousins that make other changes.

The Broad and the University of Washington have filed for patents on mitochondrial base editors.

Among their first uses will likely be to create lab mice with the precise mitochondrial DNA mutations that, in people, cause such devastating diseases. The great hope, of course, is to turn them into therapies or cures for the hundreds of mitochondrial diseases.

A British child at the center of a bitter controversy about withdrawing life support, for instance, had MDDS, which can be caused by any of hundreds of mutations. The most common cause of the most prevalent mitochondrial disease, MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes), in which children have repeated strokes, is an A where a G should be. The new mitochondrial base editor can, at least in cell culture, reverse both MDDS and MELAS mutations.

There are countless hurdles and probably a decade or more before MELAS or MDDS children can be cured this way. If a genetic therapy works, it would likely work only in young children, before brain and muscle damage become irreversible.

Families of children with mitochondrial disease have had their hopes raised and dashed before. But the failure of drug therapies, which mostly try to replace the biochemicals that dysfunctional mitochondria fail to make, has led many to think the solution needs to be more fundamental.

The father of a teenage boy who was diagnosed with a mitochondrial disease as a toddler, and who has raised funds to support research, said that with existing drugs, families like his can only hope their children lose muscle and cognitive function more slowly.

Repairing the genetic problem, “I think, is the way to go,” said the father (who lives outside New York City and asked not to be identified so as to protect his son’s privacy). “It really is the holy grail.”

  • Playing God by “scientists” is scary.
    The gene editing is something the witch doctors and scientists working for the UN and China have more on their plate than elimating dieases ect.
    Do your research, goal to édit human genres to remove desire to drink booze, smoke cigarettes, use drugs and the kicker, to remove ones beliefs in religion to remove conflict.
    What are the risks, who cares, scientists xorking for UN go off opinions, not facts.
    Story last summer about highest recorder temperature ever in Northern
    They do not mention it broke the the record from 1988 and if i remember correctly by maybe 1/2 of degree.
    Nobody seems to remember all the forest fires all over the world, you would think scientists would take that into considération, not from a old HVAC guy like

  • Hartung, J. Might Cancer Be a Failed Response to Renegade Mitochondria?
    Journal of Theoretical Biology, 94:173-78, 1982.

    Hartung, J. Cancer might be a failed response to renegade mitochondria. Journal of Theoretical Biology 21;379:91-93 [PMID: 25981632] 2015.

Comments are closed.

Sign up to receive a free weekly opinions recap from our community of experts.
Privacy Policy