Contribute Try STAT+ Today

Medicine has become a profession accessible mainly to the rich. Just look at the price tag for medical school.

In the 1960s, the four years of medical education needed to earn an M.D. in the United States could be had for about $40,000 in today’s dollars. The price is now $300,000, a 750% increase. About 70% of students take out loans to pay for medical school, graduating with an average of $200,000 in debt. One in five graduates who finance their medical education with loans accumulate more than $300,000 of debt. That average debt is increasingly concentrated in fewer people who individually owe more.

That’s not the right direction to be going in at a time when the U.S. aims to make the medical profession more inclusive. Clinician diversity improves patient care, and access to high-status professional roles in society should be available for all.

advertisement

Those dollar amounts, however, reflect only the price of medical school. Reducing the price has been the focus of many efforts to put a career in medicine within broader reach. Scholarships supported by philanthropy can lower it, for example, as they have at New York University and Weill Cornell Medicine.

But as we argued recently in the New England Journal of Medicine, price is not the same thing as cost.

advertisement

Trying to bring down the price of medical education tackles the issue from the wrong end. What we should really target is a reduction in the actual cost of producing a physician: the faculty time, course materials, classrooms, and administrative time. If we can lower the cost of medical education, we can lower its price and redirect the philanthropy behind those scholarships to other needed areas.

The Covid-19 pandemic is pointing to ways to do that.

Early in the pandemic, medical instruction that used to happen in physical classrooms went online. In March, medical students at the nearly 200 U.S. medical schools began learning subjects like reproductive endocrinology through Zoom or another virtual platform. Couldn’t they all use the same lectures?

Undergraduate teaching across the U.S. also went online in March, but the issues aren’t identical. Yes, the same lectures might run across the nation, reducing costs. But the point of college is only partly about learning Shakespeare and chemistry, which can largely be delivered online, and mostly about growing up and developing independence, which requires more presence. In the first few years of medical school, the ratio is reversed: It’s mostly about learning reproductive endocrinology, then later developing into an independent doctor.

In fact, many medical schools have long put online their preclinical courses, the period before students spend much time with patients. Few students even show up for the in-person sessions, viewing them on their own time and often at twice the speed, compressing an hour of lecture into 30 minutes of instruction. Why recreate that instruction 200 times each year at 200 medical schools?

Sharing lectures is just one way to lower the cost of producing doctors. Another is to shorten medical school from four years to three, as schools like NYU, Wisconsin, Duke, and others already strive toward, saving the cost of that instruction (paid by future doctors) by $160,000 to $230,000. That reflects one less year of tuition, an additional year of earning, and adding a year’s medical practice for the community.

The high prices of medical education and the high costs of medical education are both important. High prices have been linked to doctors avoiding lower-paying specialties, like primary care, where they may be needed most. High prices also partly explain why 73% to 79% of students entering medical school between 1988 and 2017 came from households in the top two income quintiles.

If it were less costly to produce doctors, it would be less pricey to become one. Philanthropic scholarships remain essential for a diverse workforce because it’s unlikely that the cost of medical education will fall low enough to eliminate its effectively exclusionary pricing. But by insulating students from the price of medical education, scholarships inadvertently insulate schools from the cost of medical education and risk perpetuating old ways.

The way we produce doctors is expensive, and we all benefit if we can do it at lower cost. The costly production of doctors is part of the reason what doctors do is so expensive. It is part of the reason a more diverse population doesn’t enter medicine. It is part of the reason that philanthropy going to making medical school less pricey isn’t available for making cancer care better.

And so, while we are achieving some success in lowering the price of medical education, we need to put more effort toward reducing its cost.

David A. Asch is an internist, executive director of the Center for Health Care Innovation, and professor at the Perelman School of Medicine and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. Justin Grischkan is an internal medicine resident physician at Massachusetts General Hospital and a clinical fellow in medicine at Harvard Medical School. Sean Nicholson is a professor and director of the Sloan Program in Health Administration at Cornell University.

  • In the 1970’s, U. of Mich had a 6-yr combined college/med school program. I wonder what happened to it? BTW, I can’t think of anything I learned in Gross Anatomy that I ended up using in 40+ yrs of Family Medicine practice. I suspect that is expensive too. Is it still being done?

  • Or we could start medical school in college instead of waiting until graduate school, like they do in other countries. (At grade 13 instead of grade 17.)

  • I’m not aware of my family’s quintile, but surely not top 2 during my Med school years (1991-95). To drive change in tuition I think they should show where the tuition money is going to see the value of the cost. If it is not justified, promote that information to drive change. We need transparency to be truly informed and inspired by leaders now more than ever! -M. Gigot, MD UW-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, ‘95. Go Badgers!

  • This article is such a breath of fresh air. So much focus has been put on the rigor of med school, so it’s as if the people who cannot get in are just not smart enough, but not a lot of attention is given to the fact that plenty of bright students cannot even consider medical school because of the high cost.

  • While this article touches upon a critical point that needs to be paid attention to other issues in reducing costs are the times spent on speciality. Reduce these times and costs as well as the cost of professional tests required to become a doctor.
    I mean, look if we’re going to examine this problem and come up with concrete solutions then let us examine the whole problem objectively and not just provide lip service. Make whole hearted efforts to obtain equitably in higher education for minorities.

  • Many schools are for profit especially the D.O. and the Caribbean schools. Unless the government steps in, nothing will change. Government won’t subsidize more residency spots so how are they going to subsidize med schools. Good idea but will never happen.

  • My school literally makes us teach ourselves everything. Even when we go to class they don’t teach us anything. They don’t provide board prep materials which is most of what many of us use to learn. They record lectures and reuse them (even before the pandemic) but even more so now. Many are from 2017 or so. And then now that we are on Zoom they consolidate classes from two campuses so there is less teachers yet we are still paying 16,000 a semester minimum. It is ridiculous 😡

  • Last I heard, it still takes 4 years to graduate from Duke School of Medicine. As I understand it, the formal curriculum may take 3 years but one year of research or study of choice is required in the 3rd year.

  • This seems like a naive take on how the price of education is set. Universities have no incentive to keep prices down, regardless of cost, as long as the government is willing to loan as much money as a school says that it takes to educate a student. That this is not apparent to the authors, a group of physicians who deal with insurance companies and hospitals with the same perverse incentives on a daily basis is surprising to me.

    • I am from Liberia- Low income country and from a poor family background as well. Because of the high financial cost attached to getting a medical education in Liberia as well, my dream of becoming a Medical Doctor is dying in me. I have tried several times to seek scholarship to study abroad but to no avail. I think the world needs more Medical professionals and specialists to achieve the universal health coverage.

Comments are closed.