WASHINGTON — No president has ever inherited a pandemic.

But if Joe Biden is elected in November, he has made clear that his first moments in office would mark a dramatic shift in the nation’s approach to Covid-19.

Biden’s first post-election phone call, he has said, would be to Anthony Fauci, requesting that the renowned infectious disease researcher continue his government service. For months, he and his staff have pressed for specific answers about how many coronavirus tests the U.S. could conduct by January, when he’d be sworn in as the 46th president. (Biden’s optimistic target: 100 million per month.) And he has pledged to institute daily pandemic briefings for the American public — conducted by scientists and public health experts, not by politicians.

advertisement

The platform is as much a rebuke of President Trump as it is a pandemic-response roadmap. Throughout the past six months, Trump has repeatedly undermined Fauci, suggested that the government should “slow down” coronavirus testing, and has taken center stage at careening, misinformation-heavy press briefings.

In interviews with STAT, numerous campaign surrogates, scientific advisers to Biden’s campaign, and an array of former U.S. health policy officials have made clear that Biden’s inauguration, and the weeks leading up to it, would set off a mad dash to reverse the country’s pandemic misfortunes. They described in detail a de facto Covid-19 war room, and identified the key aides who brief the former vice president.

advertisement

The Biden advisers acknowledge that after 170,000 American deaths, Covid-19 will not be easily tamed, no matter who is in the Oval Office. Partisan defiance of public health guidance is likely to persist under any president, and Biden’s administration might still face resistance from individual governors.

Nonetheless, the Biden camp says it is hatching plans for a slate of executive orders and federal guidance that could land as soon as Inauguration Day. In the hours after he’s inaugurated, his advisers said, the Senate could move to quickly confirm top health care officials — and the federal government could launch aggressive new messaging campaigns on vaccines, mask use, and social distancing.

In making the case for how he would govern, Biden’s campaign has been more concrete in how he would approach the country’s coronavirus response than perhaps any other issue. He has pledged to dramatically ramp up testing efforts, restore a biodefense official to the National Security Council, and improve Covid-19 surveillance by revamping insurance claims data.

The planning is informed by a cast of physicians who include a top Obama administration pandemic-response expert, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner, a former surgeon general, and a Yale researcher focused on health disparities.

“You need to put in place, one Day 1, a team of people who have been planning and thinking deeply about this, and who know what they’re doing,” said Nicole Lurie, the assistant health secretary for preparedness and response from 2009 to 2015 and a current adviser to Biden. “A really great thing about working with this campaign, from my perspective, is that it’s really been the A-team.”

Biden Delaware State University
Joe Biden arrives to speak at Delaware State University’s student center in Dover, Del., on June 5, 2020. JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

On March 13, Biden’s campaign faced an urgent decision about its own operations: Across the country, health officials had reported thousands of new Covid-19 cases. The escalating pandemic was racing across the U.S., but Biden was only midway through a bruising primary campaign.

The question on the table: Should Biden shut down his campaign headquarters in Philadelphia?

In a conference call, his aides brought together a group of doctors that included David Kessler, the former FDA commissioner, to seek advice.

“We recommended on that day, my first phone call, to shut down campaign headquarters,’’ Kessler told STAT. “And to the campaign’s credit, they did that within two hours.” Biden’s campaign, he noted, made that call before there was clear guidance from the local or federal governments.

The newly work-by-Zoom campaign went beyond following Kessler’s counsel on shutting down its headquarters. Before long, Biden’s policy team brought on Kessler and Vivek Murthy, the former surgeon general, to provide daily pandemic briefings to the former vice president and his top advisers.

Biden quickly labeled the pair “The Docs,” and turned to Kessler and Murthy as his top lieutenants on the pandemic, urging staff to workshop language in speeches and public statements by the physicians for their approval.

Murthy and Kessler have served as Biden’s eyes and ears on issues ranging from mask use to vaccine development to diagnostic testing. They assembled 80- to 90-page memos, briefing Biden at such length that Kessler occasionally fretted to high-level aides that he and Murthy were taking up too much of the candidate’s time.

Stef Feldman, Biden’s policy director, and Jake Sullivan, a senior adviser, frequently sat in, peppering Murthy and Kessler with their own questions. Biden, Kessler recalled, often drilled down and demanded specific estimates of how many tests the U.S. could administer by January.

Other conversations have drilled down on the supply of masks, protective gear for medical workers, and Covid-19 kits, Lurie said.

“He has been really clear that he’s going to appoint a supply-chain commander,” she said. “Clearly, the supply-chain issues are pretty significant, whether it’s about masks and PPE — none of us think right now that if there’s a really bad surge this fall and winter, that we have enough masks to protect health care workers — or whether it’s about the supply chain for diagnostics.”

While they’ve long been conducted without much public attention, the briefings in recent weeks have figured prominently into Biden’s campaign: The day he unveiled Sen. Kamala Harris of California as his running mate, he brought her to his informal Covid-19 war room. There, she sat in on a videoconference with Kessler, Murthy, Lurie, and Marcella Nunez-Smith, a physician and Yale researcher.

“We’re going to get what I get four times a week: A briefing on the state of coronavirus here and around the world, and what we should and shouldn’t be doing,” Biden told Harris, according to pool reports. “It usually takes somewhere between an hour and an hour and a half.”

Biden and his staff have pressed Kessler and Murthy, in particular, on issues as specific as equipment to transport vaccines that must be stored at below-freezing temperatures, advisers aid.

The campaign has also followed news regarding potential coronavirus treatments like dexamethasone, a steroid shown to reduce Covid-19 death rates, and remdesivir, the Gilead Sciences antiviral that has shown some impact on death rates and the duration of Covid-19 patients’ hospital stays.

“He’ll sometimes hear an expert on TV or read an expert study, and he’ll bring that question to us of what he’s heard or read,” Kessler said. “But we brought to him the clinical trials on remdesivir when that data was available. We brought to him the clinical trial data on dexamethasone. So we’re presenting him the data — obviously, he is attuned to this independently, but he’ll bring anything he hears to us, and we’ll all discuss it.”

When President Trump began to aggressively tout hydroxychloroquine, another antimalarial drug, as a Covid-19 cure-all, Biden, of course, wanted to know more.

“On hydroxychloroquine, very early on there were questions — and I simply said, Mr. Vice President, I need more time to see the data,” Kessler said. “Until I can see clinical trial data, I can’t give you a judgment on what works or doesn’t work. And he was fine with that.”

Biden’s allies are already laying out plans for a brutal transition — acknowledging that, if Biden wins, they don’t expect much bipartisan goodwill between outgoing Trump administration staffers and their incoming Biden administration counterparts.

“My guess is there won’t be a lot of reliance on the Trump team to brief the incoming Biden team,” said Kathleen Sebelius, the Obama administration health secretary who oversaw the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. “There will be information gathered from the Obama era, as much as possible, to then brief the incoming Biden team. Because I don’t know that the Trump folks paid much attention at all to the briefing books, and I’m not sure that most departments bear any resemblance to the way they were left.”

The Trump administration has been criticized for its scattered and inefficient approach to procuring masks and tests, and for abruptly undercutting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from collecting basic data about Covid-19 hospitalizations and infections.

“We know that there have been major problems with data and transparency,” Lurie said. “Whether it’s about some aspect of epidemiology, or whether it’s the supply chain, you’ve got to pretty rapidly get your arms around a set of facts that you can really count on — that has to be done really during the transition, and before.”

The administration would also install new leadership atop key health care agencies, like the Department of Health and Human Services, the CDC, and the FDA.

Much of Biden’s health policy team, nonetheless, would need to be confirmed by the Senate, and therefore would likely not be in place for weeks or months after his inauguration, forcing a newly sworn-in president to rely on career staff and acting officials to steer the pandemic response.

There’s already a playbook for such a scenario, however: In interviews, numerous Democratic operatives noted that Biden already has experience taking over a country in crisis and charting a new course even in the absence of a full cabinet.

In 2009, Biden was sworn in alongside President Obama amid the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Within a month, Congress had passed a sweeping stimulus package that many in his inner circle view as a template for significant Covid-19 dealmaking in the opening weeks of his presidency.

Still, some confirmations could come quickly — Sebelius noted that some cabinet officials were sworn in within days of Obama’s inauguration. (The Senate confirmed Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, on the second day of his presidency.)

“That’s how I would expect Joe Biden to act,” Sebelius said. “He will tee people up, he will ask the committees to meet, he will actually be able to swear a number of secretaries in on Day 1.”

But outside experts have warned that Biden shouldn’t expect to orchestrate a major course-correction instantly, or at all. And some of Biden’s plans are perhaps too optimistic, such as his hope of conducting 100 million tests per month by January (the country has conducted just 73 million, to date), or of establishing a new insurance code for Covid-19 treatment, to be used for federal pandemic surveillance (such claims data is typically gathered long after patients receive care).

“I don’t think anyone is suggesting that we can reverse” the past six months, said Sheila Burke, the former chief of staff to Sen. Bob Dole, the longtime Republican majority leader. “But rather we can improve upon the situation going forward — whether it’s the availability of testing, whether it’s the availability of PPE, or whether it is establishing an expectation standards with respect to the use of masks.”

Even in the face of the Trump administration’s haphazard response, however, leading Republicans in Congress have argued Biden isn’t up to the job of managing a pandemic.

“If Joe Biden was president, we’d still be debating whether planes from China should be coming to America instead of discussing the six vaccines we have about ready to go through BARDA or the more than 600 therapeutics we have about to come online,” said Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, in a recent Fox News interview. (Biden did not oppose Trump’s ban on direct flights from China when it was issued, and the U.S. government has not yet approved a vaccine for Covid-19, though it has issued a number of emergency authorizations for therapeutics.)

Obama Fauci Biden
Biden participates in a 2016 press briefing on the Zika virus with President Obama, health secretary Sylvia Burwell, CDC director Tom Frieden, and Fauci. Mark Wilson/Getty Images

In a speech last week, Trump leveled his latest attack on Biden’s coronavirus approach, accusing him of “ignoring the scientific evidence and putting left-wing politics before facts and evidence.” Trump’s campaign has also repeatedly rebroadcast a remark from Ron Klain, the former Biden chief of staff and Obama administration Ebola czar, recalling that the administration “did every possible thing wrong” in responding to H1N1.

Biden, throughout his campaign, has punched back.

“I don’t think he’s competent enough to know what to do. He just waved the white flag.”

Joe Biden, in remarks about President Trump's response to the Covid-19 pandemic

“You know, I used to think it was because of his personality, but I just don’t think he can intellectually handle it,” he told reporters on Wednesday. “I don’t think he’s competent enough to know what to do. He just waved the white flag.”

At the Democratic National Convention this week, Biden’s supporters have doubled down: Former president Bill Clinton described Trump’s pandemic response as “only chaos.” Kristin Urquiza, a Democratic voter, blamed Trump’s disdain for stay-at-home orders and Arizona’s hasty reopening for her father’s death.

In making their case, Biden’s backers argue that he would take charge of the public health crisis with the benefit of his decades-deep web of connections in Washington’s health care intelligentsia.

As vice president, he frequently crossed paths with Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, particularly during the H1N1 flu pandemic of 2009 and the Ebola scare several years later. Fauci, Biden has pledged, would have “full access to the Oval Office.”

Despite Trump’s criticism of Biden for his role in the Obama administration’s response to H1N1, which sickened 60 million Americans but killed only 12,469 — roughly 7% of Covid-19’s U.S. death toll to date — Biden’s campaign has cast his pandemic-response experience as a strength.

His chief of staff during the early Obama years, Klain, has remained outspoken on Covid-19 issues throughout the pandemic.

Another key campaign adviser, Chris Jennings, is a health policy veteran who worked in the Obama administration alongside Lurie, the government’s top pandemic-preparedness official, and Murthy, a surgeon general known for his focus on addiction, gun violence, and the phenomenon of loneliness as a public health crisis.

And as FDA commissioner, Kessler, now a top adviser, worked closely with Fauci during the HIV/AIDS crisis of the 1980s and 1990s.

Another occasional campaign adviser, Greg Simon, is a longtime Biden confidant dating back to the vice president’s “Cancer Moonshot” in 2016, following the death of his son, former Delaware attorney general Beau Biden, from brain cancer. Following Trump’s election, Biden hired Simon to run the Biden Cancer Initiative, the cancer-research nonprofit that folded once Biden declared his candidacy last year.

“He’s grounded” in health care issues, Kessler said. “He knows the players. He has enormous admiration for Dr. Fauci.”

Should Biden become president, advisers said he would immediately emphasize the stark differences between Trump’s regime and his own. The most important element of Biden’s plan, they say, is simply that it exists.

“I expect will be very clear, unambiguous communication, coming from the very top, about what needs to be done,” Lurie said.

  • In 20/20 hindsight, it might have been best to put people young enough to have very low risk of severe illness in work camps for the spring and summer- pay them some decent amount – but they have to sign up for quarantine within the camp and for a couple weeks of isolation before leaving the camp. Partly make-work, partly making PPE, learning public quarantine principles to use at home, email and telephone contact tracing work, etc.
    By now, we might have had a large workforce of immune young people trained to do all kinds of necessary jobs, for right now, but especially if the epidemic continues.
    One task added to the obvious might have been crowd control at protests, so that cities were not burned down- that is in the billions of dollars in damages now.
    My point with this post is, it might now be a purely medical issue but the article is about what Biden plans to do – I believe both he and Trump are very seriously derelict for not having a plan to direct the rioting energy into something better. The original plan, really, was no plan – huddle in your homes until the danger is over – that is untenable, clearly, – we were kind of hoping for a miracle – Trump clearly did – “Maybe the virus will go away in warm weather” – but Biden’s plan is more of the same. They need plans to deal with another year of this, in case vaccines do not work, but neither seems to have one, except wait for science/medical establishment to save us.

  • The future of the United States is the circumstances of Europe now, where despite lockdowns or not, Sweden or not, SARS-CoV-2 is surging again, with populations angry about failure to contain and business shutdowns because of fear of pandemic and anticipation of gov’t shutdowns because of What Else Works?

  • Typical snowballing article against the current administration. When will objectivity and integrity return to you so called information experts? Joe Biden won’t do anything that isn’t already being done (except to lock down because “a” scientist might say that’s what we need.) National policy to abate the disease and assist the states has limited our national exposure to less than 1.7% of the population (to date). Even in the most badly affected state (LA), the infection rate shown via testing is only 3%. What possible improvement over that could Joe Biden do?? Nothing. We’re already ‘recovering’ from the pandemic; Biden will be riding the wave after Trump swam out and caught it. And if we need a forecast of what Biden would do, let’s look at the H1N1 epidemic during the Obama administration, when 60M Americans got infected vs the 5.6M from COVID-19 so far. Give us a break.

  • Biden was in office when H1N1 hit the US. Biden’s chief of staff, Ron Klain said about the swine flue pandemic:“It is purely a fortuity that this isn’t one of the great mass casualty events in American history…It had nothing to do with us doing anything right. It just had to do with luck.” The H1N1 virus is not a coronavirus and is far less contagious and deadly than COVID-19. The Obama team distributed emergency equipment from the federal stockpile that President Bush wisely built up; however, the stockpile of PPE was never replenished, leading to the PPE crisis that we faced early in this pandemic. H1N1 targeted young children, but no schools were shut down; in fact, the Obama administration did very little to influence commerce or transportation. Perhaps if Biden is elected, he will declare the pandemic over on Jan 21, 2021, and re-open everything.

  • Biden ridiculed the flight ban from ground zero of the virus in Wuhan, even as secreted video clips from on the ground there showed people lying on sidewalks, chaos and panic in emergency rooms, and soldiers dressed in haz-mat gear storming into apartment buildings and dragging people out for state-imposed quarantines. Trump ordered the flight ban on January 31st, before the WHO could even manage to make firm statements about the impending danger–and all of this is but an internet search away with dates clearly reported. Had Biden been president on January 31st he would not have put the travel ban in place and allowed more people to pour into the country spreading more covid-19. The guiding principle of opposing the flight ban was that it was somehow xenophobic to prevent people traveling here from the very heart of the outbreak. Had Italy been able to stop the many leather workers from Wuhan to come to Italy when they did, they would have controlled their outbreak. WHO followed a similar feel-good emotionally-driven ideology, that if somehow we act to self-protect over a virus that knows no border or ethnicity we are being ‘mean.’ The actions of the governors of NY, NJ, MI, CA, PA which forced covid positive sick patients into nursing homes are responsible for 40+% of the total nationwide death count. Their executive orders are available online as well, even as Trump made elaborate arrangements in heavy hit NY state such as pulling up a mostly unused hospital ship to park at 42nd Street and using the military to open a pop-up hospital in the Javitz convention center, also hardly used. They weren’t following federal guidelines, yet they point fingers of blame at the president because they cannot account for their errors in judgement. The mad scramble for PPE: it is grossly dishonest to leave out the FACT that China spent January going around the planet buying up PPE and shipping it back to China, also a simple internet search away to verify. They then tried to sell it back to the same nations they bought it from marked up in the millions, or sell them in some cases faulty rotten PPE and other equipment which had to be tossed out, as in Spain. It is dishonest to leave out this fact as STAT once again pushed its decidedly unscientific partisanship.

    • Karl Weinrich – which part is “patently untrue” ? I think the high nursing home mortality due to failure to keep infected people out is well documented – I think he has it wrong about California, we did not do that, as far as I heard – the advantage of a couple months knowledge saved California from many mistakes IMO.

      Also, there was SOME opposition to the travel ban – but Fox distorts that because there were other travel bans not really to stop the epidemic issued the same time

      News reports, outside of FOX, indicated China did grab up a bunch of PPE about the time they knew a pandemic might be coming, but before it was widely known- so, it is a reasonable inference they kept the pandemic secret so they could get all they needed to fight it, even though the secrecy hurt the rest of the world, A LOT. A LOT.
      It is really clear, when you look at the characteristics of the disease, that doctors in China had to know, within a week or two of the first severely ill patients, they were dealing with a highly infectious respiratory virus, easily spread human to human, and highly lethal. And so it is clear China lied when they said “No evidence of human to human transmission” in a press release in January.
      So, I am not sure the OP is right about all of it, but you have rejected all of it, please be specific, which parts are “patently untrue”>?

  • I am NOT excusing Trump, or blaming state officials for mistakes, but is it unfair to point out, the New York City Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene website says “With an annual budget of $1.6B and 6,000 employees in the five boroughs, we’re one of the largest public health agencies in the world” and perhaps they should have done better?

    If you look at some of the alternate vaccination efforts by biohacker type groups, weren’t they looking at (possibly) creating a vaccine for a few hundred thousand dollars? If the spike, by itself, is enough to confer immunity, some small amount of money would be enough buy a bunch of spike protein, mix it up with some adjuvant, and test it, right? The vaccine efforts were all directed to more advanced stuff, but early (small scale) animal tests showed efficacy for a very conventional easy to make vaccine. But no one did it, apparently.
    The epidemic seems to bring the light the failings of all our institutions, which mostly come down to, they are all sclerotic, none of them can do anything outside their norms, no matter how great the emergency. The pandemic was rightly, compared to WW2, as needing immediate, drastic, unified action- but if this was really WW2, the Germans and Japaneses would be meeting up for a victory party somewhere in the Midwest about now, because no one had the courage to do anything different, like try Human Challenge testing for all plausible vaccine candidates starting in April. Sad.

  • Where to start? The ‘experts’, including St Fauci, went from 1) C19 is no big deal to 2) masks are dangerous to 3) millions will die to 4) we’ll run out of ventilators etc. Medical Experts are at best- just that. They are not economists. Leaders have to listen and lead. I didn’t vote for Trump but am tired of hearing about Biden or Fauci ‘saving us.’

    That said- this is just another STAT election-year hit piece. Are there any science writers on staff?

    • Might you mean ‘millions _could_ die _if_’, and ‘we’ll run out of ventilators _if_’? Are you saying simple, categorical statements were made in each case? Or did certain reporting turn the actual statements into categorical headlines?

Comments are closed.

Sign up to receive a free weekly opinions recap from our community of experts.
Privacy Policy