Contribute Try STAT+ Today

Use of inexpensive, readily available steroid drugs to treat people hospitalized with Covid-19 reduced the risk of death by one-third, according to an analysis encompassing seven different clinical trials conducted by the World Health Organization and published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The positive steroid findings — the result of a pooled look at data known as a meta-analysis — confirm a similar survival benefit reported in June from a single, large study. Corticosteroids are the first, and so far only, therapy shown to improve the odds of survival for critically ill patients with Covid-19.

Based on the newly published data, the WHO on Wednesday issued new treatment guidelines calling for corticosteroids to become the standard of care for patients with “severe and critical” Covid-19. Such patients should receive 7-10 days of treatment, a WHO panel said. But it cautioned against use of the steroids in patients with non-severe illness, saying that “indiscriminate use of any therapy for COVID-19 would potentially rapidly deplete global resources and deprive patients who may benefit from it most as potentially life-saving therapy.”

advertisement

“The consistent findings of benefit in these studies provide definitive data that corticosteroids should be first-line treatment for critically ill patients with COVID-19,” said Hallie Prescott and Todd Rice, professors of medicine at the University of Michigan and Vanderbilt University, respectively, in an accompanying JAMA editorial.

Nahid Bhadelia, medical director of the Special Pathogens Unit at the Boston University School of Medicine, said “there has been widespread adoption of steroids in the care of critically ill patients with Covid-19” since the first trial results in June. “This is particularly true in many resource-limited countries where I work. This meta-analysis adds further confidence” to those results, she added.

advertisement

Other groups, including the National Institutes of Health and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, have already issued similar guidelines recommending the use of steroids to treat patients with severe Covid-19.

The new analysis included data on 678 patients randomized to treatment with steroids and 1,025 patients to usual care or a placebo. All of the patients had a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19 and were admitted to the hospital. Most were on mechanical ventilation. Twenty-nine percent of the patients were women, but a breakdown by race was not disclosed.

After 28 days, 33% of the steroid-treated patients had died, compared to 41% of the patients on usual care or a placebo. In the meta-analysis, the difference in absolute mortality translated into a 34% reduction in the risk of death for those given steroids — a statistically significant result.

The survival benefit remained consistent regardless of the type of steroid administered, the dose, or whether patients were receiving mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen only, researchers found.

Eighteen percent of patients on steroids reported side effects compared to 23% of patients on usual care or placebo. Adverse events varied across trials but there was no suggestion that the risk of serious adverse events was higher in patients assigned to corticosteroids except for the two smallest trials, in which the total number of serious adverse events was one and three.

Corticosteroids do not directly attack the novel coronavirus. Instead, the drugs work by dampening the activity of a patient’s immune system to prevent it from attacking the lungs — a serious and often fatal condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS.

The first evidence that common steroids could improve the survival of patients with severe Covid-19 came in June when British researchers conducting a large clinical trial called RECOVERY reported that the use of dexamethasone reduced the death rate by 35% in patients requiring ventilation and by 20% in patients who needed oxygen but were not ventilated.

Prior to the public announcement of the RECOVERY trial results, physicians had been reluctant to use steroids to treat severely ill Covid-19 patients due to concerns about side effects. Clinical trials involving other immune-suppressing drugs like IL-6 inhibitors were also yielding disappointing results.

Patrick Vallance, the U.K. government’s chief scientific adviser, speaking in June, called the dexamethasone survival benefit from the RECOVERY study “tremendous news” and “a groundbreaking development in our fight” against Covid-19. But the findings also hampered efforts to confirm the results. Other randomized and controlled clinical trials investigating the use of steroids at that time were unable to enroll additional patients.

For that reason, the WHO’s Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group stepped in to coordinate the meta-analysis of these incomplete but randomized and controlled trials. The analysis was done prospectively, meaning that data and outcomes from the seven individual trials were not known in advance, but were shared for the first time with the WHO team in order to reduce the chance of bias.

Three of the individual clinical trials of steroids were published in JAMA Wednesday, alongside the WHO’s meta-analysis.

“The efforts of the clinical trial groups for the launch and conduct of high-quality trials in the midst of a pandemic should be acknowledged as an important accomplishment. The agreement among the trialists to share unpublished data with WHO is an example of how science can advance and is critical in the midst of what is likely to be numerous underpowered [randomized controlled trials],” write Prescott and Rice in their JAMA editorial.

The WHO’s meta-analysis leaves some questions about steroids and Covid-19 unanswered, said Boston University’s Bhadelia.

“It still remains unclear if there is any use in starting [steroids] earlier. Most clinicians, including myself, would not do so with the current data,” she said, adding that they’re also uncertain whether to use biomarkers to guide therapy rather than oxygenation only.

One of the concerns about steroids is, given too early in the course of Covid-19, they might hamper the body’s ability to eliminate the virus, leading to worse outcomes. But steroids might also benefit a subset of Covid-19 patients who don’t yet need oxygen but have lab tests indicating early signals of their immune system going into overdrive.

“It would be interesting to know if co-administration of an antiviral may help reduce viral load while the earlier steroids work on the inflammatory component in that group of people,” Bhadelia said. “We also need more data around co-infections in the setting of steroid use.”

  • I am 80 years old. While on a cruise in February, both my son-in-law (who was also on the cruise) and I, became very ill with corona virus symptoms. I had a bottle of prednisone with me. He and I took a 20 mg tablet everyday for approximately10 days and both eventually got over the symptoms.

  • Seems like Dr. Richard Bartlett’s treatment with inhaled Budesonide, (from a nebulizer) presented in early July, was right on track.

    • Quite possibly. Inhaled corticosteroids seem (by extrapolation) to have a good degree of effectiveness in suppressing the inflammation cascade which leads to ARDS. Our past experience with this use is limited to treatment of asthma. There was also a veterinary study. It seems that a strong dose of budesonide, or a mix of the same with dexamethasone, can be very effective. Inhaled steroids further seem to have a lesser degree of side effects than those steroids used by a systemic intake. This is very important in those high risk patients with diabetes. But further study is necessary before this can be confirmed as a legitimate front-line treatment.

  • There is a drugs now being tested in Indonesia combination of dexamethasone and procain called FAI .Invented by a Filipino . Patented in the U.S. Its effective, being used for 35yrs. already in the Phil’s. Take a look and save mankind from covid19.

  • So the original report that hydroxychloroquine was beneficial since it reduced the massive toxic cytochime storm was right on track!

    • Nope. Zinc works as an anti-viral in a petri dish, and possibly within the mouth only, where there are few outside biological factors; but not in vitro. HCQ as accessing a cell pathway for anti-viral zinc has been proven ineffective and de-listed as a legitimate use by the FDA.

  • As an ongoing patient with both psoriatric arthritis and COPD, with multiple allergies, I am all too familiar with the potential side effects of my daily steroid medication, and very grateful for every breathe I take because of it. This research is life-saving, and I, too, am very grateful to be alive each day.

  • Can anyone do a study on mycotoxin poisoning and how many people are very ill from toxins from mold? 6 children died at Seattle Children’s hosp. In 2019 from mold exposure in their operating rooms.

  • Why isn’t there more detailed stratification of results based on the start date of steroid treatment? Wasn’t that a big deal with the remedesivir in terms mortality reduction vs. the date of drug administration in the hospital?

  • I had pneumonia from covid back in late February. My GP immediately gave me steroids. I recovered quickly. I’m unclear on why, with this pandemic, all the stuff we previously knew is now a revelation. Like the lung scarring. Or strokes. All true for regular pneumonia. Frustrating to say the least.

  • Steroids were not used in the treatment of ARDS prior to covid-19.
    Why are they effective against covid-19 induced ARDS.
    Where cortisol levels assessed in these studies

Comments are closed.

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy