Contribute Try STAT+ Today

A science journal owned by the Alzheimer’s Association punished a trio of leading researchers after they published a stinging rebuke of Biogen’s controversial treatment aducanumab — a drug that the powerful advocacy group is lobbying regulators to approve.

In late December, the researchers told STAT, the Alzheimer’s & Dementia journal notified them that they had committed an “ethical violation” by tweeting a link to their own deeply skeptical aducanumab paper, which was not yet in its final form. The researchers were placed on a two-year publishing probation, and a letter disclosing the censure was sent to their academic bosses.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT+ and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT+ is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • STAT+ Conversations
  • Weekly opportunities to engage with our reporters and leading industry experts in live video conversations
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
  • How could the “early view” versions of articles posted online on the journal’s website ahead of print publication be considered “embargoed” when the abstracts of such articles are publicly available and the full articles can be purchased and downloaded by anyone. They clearly are NOT embargoed. Many people, including reporters, journal article authors and other interested parties routinely tweet about such online “early view” or “ahead of print” articles.

  • The problem isn’t with FDA “collaborating” with industry. The problem is with the agency CONSPIRING with industry to circumvent well-accepted scientific standards, hampering innovation and providing false hope. Hydroxychloroquine for Covid anyone? How about some eteplirsen for DMD?

    Throwing a leaden life vest to a drowning man, giving false hope, is not an act of compassion, but of cruelty. The FDA has much work to regain the confidence of the public in terms of its scientific objectivity and rigor.

Comments are closed.