Skip to Main Content

The European Medicines Agency has concluded there is a link between AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine and “very rare” but dangerous clotting events reported in a number of countries where the vaccine has been used, events which in some cases have been fatal.

A safety committee, the agency said Wednesday, concluded that “unusual blood clots with low blood platelets should be listed as very rare side effects” of the vaccine.


Regulators stressed that the benefits of the vaccine, which was shown to be 76% effective at preventing Covid infections in a large U.S.-based study, still outweigh its risks. “This vaccine has proven to be highly effective to prevent severe disease and hospitalization,” said Emer Cooke, the EMA’s executive director. “And it is saving lives.”

In a separate briefing, British regulators were more cautious, saying that although there is growing evidence of a link between rare cases of blood clots and the vaccine, further investigation was needed.

The announcements are another blow to the effort to create an affordable and easy-to-administer product envisioned as the backbone of the vaccination campaign in much of the world. Some European countries that had already authorized the vaccine have restricted its use to older populations in an effort to minimize the risk of clotting events; on Wednesday, U.K. regulators said that they would recommend that people under 30 receive other vaccines. Most of the cases of blood clots have occurred have been in people under the age of 60. 



Disorders caused by blood clots, including heart attacks, vein thromboses, and strokes, are common. But the types of clots that may be linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine are exceedingly rare. They have been marked by low levels of platelets — the blood cell fragments that normally cause clotting. 

The types of clots seen include cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, or CVST, a type of blood clot that occurs in the veins that drain blood from the brain, and a similar condition in the abdomen, known as splanchic vein thrombosis. The clots sometimes occur in combination with bleeding.

The safety committee reviewed 62 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 24 cases of splanchnic vein thrombosis reported in the European Union’s drug safety databases as of March 22. Eighteen of these cases were fatal. The cases came from the reporting systems of the European Economic Area and the United Kingdom, where 25 million people had received the vaccine.

The EMA estimated that the rare side effect is being reported in 1 in 100,000 people. The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, or MHRA, gave a slightly lower figure of one case for every 250,000 vaccinations. Both figures could shift as the data, as well as potential causes, are studied.

From early on, the development of AstraZeneca’s vaccine has been dogged with communications missteps and other problems. But the tie to rare blood clots could have particularly far-reaching implications, both in terms of the vaccine’s use and vaccine hesitancy overall.

The first cases of clotting in people who had been vaccinated were first reported in late February. Since then, a small but growing number of previously healthy people, often women in their 30s and 40s, have developed unusual clotting problems within days of having been vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine.

The adverse events resemble a condition known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, or HIT, a rare phenomenon in which people who are given the anti-clotting drug heparin actually develop widely disseminated clotting problems.

In the events that seemed linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine, people developed both a large number of clots and a low platelet count — an unusual combination. The reaction has been dubbed vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia by Andreas Greinacher of the University of Greifswald, a German clotting expert.

Greinacher, who reported the phenomenon in a preprint article, has described the condition as treatable.

“We know what to do: how to diagnose it, and how to treat it,” he told reporters last month, according to Science.

Many countries are counting on AstraZeneca’s vaccine. The European Union alone has purchased 400 million doses of the vaccine. The United States has bought 300 million doses of the vaccine, the largest pre-purchase deal of all those contracted by Operation Warp Speed, the vaccine and therapeutics fast-tracking project started during the Trump administration.

Whether it will be used here remains an open question. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told Reuters last week that the U.S. may not need the vaccine.

“My general feeling is that given the contractual relationships that we have with a number of companies, that we have enough vaccine to fulfill all of our needs without invoking AstraZeneca,” Fauci said, without referring to the clotting problem now associated with the vaccine.

AstraZeneca has not yet applied to the Food and Drug Administration for the emergency use authorization that would be needed to deploy the vaccine in the United States, despite the fact that it has been nearly two weeks since the company announced results from the U.S. trial.

“We are currently progressing our EUA submission for AZD1222,” Michele Meixell, senior director of external and executive communications, told STAT on Tuesday. “No further updates right now.”

Regulators say that they will be watching other vaccines, which so far seem to have lower rates of these rare clotting disorders. In particular, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses a similar technology to the AstraZeneca one. So far there have been three cases of blood clots associated with low platelets seen with the J&J vaccine, but Peter Arlett, the head of pharmacovigilance at the EMA, said that figure is “extremely small” given the 4.5 million of doses of that vaccine that have been given worldwide. “I think it would be fair to say there is intensive monitoring across the vaccines,” Artlett said.

On a separate conference call with reporters, Adam Finn, a pediatrician at the University of Bristol, said that it would be important to continue to monitor all of the vaccines.

“My fervent hope is that this is a unique problem to one vaccine,” Finn said, “but I also fear that it may not be.”

Correction: A previous version incorrectly described the clots seen with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine.

  • I received the second jab in January. I’m 73. It seems like day 16 post jab is the latest reported blood clot incident, so….I’m hoping I’m out of the woods. Next up is, will I ever get a cdc card if U.S. doesn’t approve it, as you know planes and other businesses will require it at some point.

  • Pausing AZ doses in countries like Australia and NZ (where there are ZERO cases of COVID-19 in the community outside of quarantine hotels) might make sense given the 4 in one million chance of this very serious problem and circa 1 in a million chance of death is meaningful vs ZERO COVID-19 deaths.

    Doing so in Canada, Europe the UK etc where there are meaningful deaths every single day is lunacy given you are literally condemning as many people to death per day as are likely to die as vaccinating the entire population.

    And no it isn’t as simple as just using another vaccine. These countries don’t have the luxury like the U.S. of relying entirely on Pfizer, Moderna and J&J. Doing so means a rollout that will take months longer than otherwise and a pandemic that will spread far further and kill many, many more people than otherwise.

Comments are closed.