Although most Americans appear to favor price controls on medicines, a recent survey indicates there is also some hesitancy if such a move would limit innovation that produces new drugs. The findings suggest warnings issued by the pharmaceutical industry that price controls might impede the flow of needed salves have caught the attention of a growing swath of the public.

Specifically, about 63 percent of adults do not want the government to control prices if that yields fewer innovative drugs, according to the survey of 1,240 adults released by Wells Fargo analyst David Maris. He noted there was little difference expressed regardless of the sex, age, or region of the country. In fact, 55 percent or more of each age bracket worried that innovation would suffer.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus. To get you started, enjoy 50% off your first 3 months!


What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

    • Yes I have read and analyzed this. To get the numbers projected sales on average have to go up about $75 billion per year. Developed countries cannot deliver considering about 1.6 billion inhabitants who spend about $0.85 per day per patient per patient. On the other hand the remaining 5.6 billion (rest of the global population) spend about $0.06 per day per patient.

      Achieving $75 billion per growth snouts to creating 1.5 Pfizer every year. A very unlikely situation when 80% of the population has to think how to scrounge two meals every day.

      The numbers in the report are easy to project but need rationality.

      Coming to drug innovation most of the recent medicines are for orphan diseases and are high priced for grw. Marginally better drugs are also high priced and unaffordable. Lot has to thought through.

      Many times I consider many polls trying to speculate without thinking. Is the poll being quoted such a case?

  • Innovation is not a foreign word to the chemists and chemical engineers of the United States. If we can send a man to the moon and bring him back, yes we can innovate.

    Let no one think or scare us of “lack of innovation”. However, it has to come from within the companies and not the regulators or any other government body. Yes they can nudge but “We the People” have and will always excel.

    Let the Force be with US.

  • Ah, mr ed, they ‘may well be’ effective. What did Napoleon say about ‘God is on the side with the heavy artillery?’ Although given current events, surprise may be the new normal, yes?

    • Observer, as I once said to Mr Jimmy down at the corner drug store, while sipping my cherry coke, I said Jimmy, you can’t always get what you want, but if you try sometime you just might find you get what you need. Same goes for drugs.

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy