Is the Trump administration siding with consumer groups over drug makers in the fight over patient access and patent rights?

The US trade representative on Friday released its annual 301 Watch List, which identifies and ranks countries based on their willingness to protect intellectual property. The annual list is of great concern to drug makers, which argue that some countries fail to sufficiently protect and enforce patent rights. As a result, they complain that revenues are hurt and innovation is discouraged.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT Plus is a premium subscription that delivers daily market-moving biopharma coverage and in-depth science reporting from a team with decades of industry experience.

What's included?

  • Authoritative biopharma coverage and analysis, interviews with industry pioneers, policy analysis, and first looks at cutting edge laboratories and early stage research
  • Subscriber-only networking events and panel discussions across the country
  • Monthly subscriber-only live chats with our reporters and experts in the field
  • Discounted tickets to industry events and early-bird access to industry reports

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • The headline doesn’t seem to quite go with the article? Seems like it should read, “is Trump admin siding with pharma?” since the 301 list is unchanged.

    • Hi Spring Texan,

      Thanks for writing. I agree that, since the 301 list is unchanged, it would not please consumer advocates. On the other hand, some appear to have expected the Trump administration to be less accepting of the TRIPS agreement. On that basis, there seems to be a pleasant surprise. And as the headline notes, its just one surprise.

      Hope that helps,
      ed at pharmalot

Sign up for our Daily Recap newsletter

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy