U.S. senator is trying to lower prices for medicines that are discovered with taxpayer dollars, and his effort amounts to a new twist to unraveling a complicated controversy that has embroiled the U.S. Department of Defense, large drug makers, numerous lawmakers, and consumer groups.

Late last month, Angus King (I-Maine) successfully added an amendment to a Defense Department funding bill that consumer groups say would effectively allow an end run around drug makers that priced products — which were developed with taxpayer dollars — higher than what is charged in seven other countries. The trigger would be determined by median prices and per capita income compared with the U.S.

This is a STAT Plus article and is only available to STAT Plus subscribers.
To read the full story, subscribe to STAT Plus or log in to your account.
Good news: your first 30 days are on us.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • I believe Shrek will go for the well known ” Reverse Prozac Defense”. His lawyer will argue that subtherapuetic levels of fluoxetine in Bro’s blood caused him to commit the alleged deeds.

  • Hmm – Sanofi ” not pursuing the project for a “commercial return.” May I observe that I have my doubts?
    One is reminded of the old saw ‘”We are a non-profit corporation. That wasn’t the plan … it’s just the way things turned out.”

Recommended Stories

Sign up for our biotech newsletter, The Readout

A guide to what’s new in biotech — delivered straight to your inbox every weekday morning.