J

ohnson & Johnson (JNJ) chief executive officer Alex Gorsky was initially chastised last week for deciding to stay on President Trump’s manufacturing advisory council, before reversing course just as Trump announced the panel would be dissolved after a series of defections.

A trio of internal memos sent to J&J employees, reviewed by STAT, offer some insight into Gorsky’s reasoning.

This is a STAT Plus article and you can unlock it by subscribing to STAT Plus today. It's easy! Your first 30 days are free and if you don't enjoy your subscription you can cancel any time.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • The adage is if you want to join the club you have to pay your dues, even if it pisses off a few shareholders. Frazier and Gorsky have lost their seats at the adult table even if the councils have been dissolved.

  • I am puzzled by the last sentence of this article. The whole article is about the J and J CEO’s thought process as events unfolded. The article answers the question in the last sentence. The answer to that question is essentially why the article was written.

    • Hi TJ,

      Thanks for the note. I was attempting to offer my own thought – if Frazier could take a stand after Trump’s initial remarks, why couldn’t Gorsky?

      Yes, Gorsky did attempt to address that in his memos/blog posts, but I also think he danced around that issue.

      In short, I think Gorsky – and all of the council members – should have resigned sooner, and I was addressing the question to readers. Maybe others agree that his answers didn’t cut it. I was simply trying to prompt some thought.

      Regards
      ed at pharmalot

Sign up for our Morning Rounds newsletter

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine.