Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) chief executive officer Alex Gorsky was initially chastised last week for deciding to stay on President Trump’s manufacturing advisory council, before reversing course just as Trump announced the panel would be dissolved after a series of defections.

A trio of internal memos sent to J&J employees, reviewed by STAT, offer some insight into Gorsky’s reasoning.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus. To get you started, enjoy 50% off your first 3 months!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • The adage is if you want to join the club you have to pay your dues, even if it pisses off a few shareholders. Frazier and Gorsky have lost their seats at the adult table even if the councils have been dissolved.

  • I am puzzled by the last sentence of this article. The whole article is about the J and J CEO’s thought process as events unfolded. The article answers the question in the last sentence. The answer to that question is essentially why the article was written.

    • Hi TJ,

      Thanks for the note. I was attempting to offer my own thought – if Frazier could take a stand after Trump’s initial remarks, why couldn’t Gorsky?

      Yes, Gorsky did attempt to address that in his memos/blog posts, but I also think he danced around that issue.

      In short, I think Gorsky – and all of the council members – should have resigned sooner, and I was addressing the question to readers. Maybe others agree that his answers didn’t cut it. I was simply trying to prompt some thought.

      Regards
      ed at pharmalot

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy