This is a challenging time to be running a drug maker.

To be sure, there is plenty of positive news. Congress heeded the call to pass legislation for speeding drug approvals. The Trump administration installed a Food and Drug Administration commissioner who is sympathetic to industry. More innovative medicines are finding their way to patients. And despite criticism over pricing, Congress has not taken any steps that might displease drug makers.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus. To get you started, enjoy 50% off your first 3 months!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • Hi Ed,

    I see Gilead as having >$25 billion cash outside of US (Meg Tirrell’s bar chart). I can see why repatriation tax reform is very important. But can Gilead use the money to go beyond the 15% holding and outright acquire Galapagos when the stand-still agreement expires (supposed sometime in 2018)?

    http://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/galapagos-ceo-confirms-gilead-standstill-agreement-active-quashing-takeover-talk

    Must such transaction occur in the US? If not, then would the “foreign cash” be subjected to US tax?

    Thanks,

    John

    • Hi John
      I’m not familiar with the terms of the agreement, but once a standstill expires, generally a stake can be increased, of course. But again, depends upon the terms here. Not sure about the answer to your other question about where an acquisition must take place, unfortunately.
      ed at pharmalot

  • Heart attack and stroke remain the leading causes of death globally and there appears to be a lack of new, promising drugs in the pipeline. What are your thoughts on the industry’s plan to address this problem?

    • Hi Damion
      That’s a big market. The key is demonstrating reductions in morbidity and mortality from CV events, which take lots of patients and time = money. A good candidate should merit the investment, but each company has its own agenda that dictates where resources are spent, right? So depends if a winning compound appears.
      Regards
      ed at pharmalot

Your daily dose of news in health and medicine

Privacy Policy