A

bipartisan bill aimed at helping terminally ill patients gain access to experimental medicines would leave intact the controversial role of the Food and Drug Administration, a notion that will likely upset backers of the so-called right-to-try movement.

The draft legislation, which is being developed with help from the FDA, also includes a provision that seeks to reassure anxious drug makers about making their treatments available, but to what extent this move makes the effort easier to forge a compromise is uncertain.

This is a STAT Plus article and you can unlock it by subscribing to STAT Plus today. It's easy! Your first 30 days are free and if you don't enjoy your subscription you can cancel any time.
Already a subscriber? Log in here.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

  • Ah, an interesting point of view – “we don’t believe the government should have a role in that decision-making process once a drug is determined to be safe enough to give to people in human trials,” said Starlee Coleman, a spokeswoman for the Goldwater Institute” – but there is a true difference between safe enough for trials and ‘safe and effective.’
    Trials do surprise, don’t they? I will demure from providing examples.

Sign up for our Morning Rounds newsletter

Your daily dose of what’s new in health and medicine.