In a setback to the pharmaceutical industry, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decided that consumers who claim harm from a generic medicine can sue brand-name drug makers for intentionally failing to update warnings that generic companies are obligated to place on product labeling.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by a man who charged that he suffered side effects, notably sexual dysfunction, after taking a generic version of Proscar, a Merck (MRK) drug used to treat enlarged prostates. And he maintained that two years before he took the generic, which was sold by Mylan (MYL), Merck changed Proscar labeling in other countries to warn about persistent erectile dysfunction, but had not done so in the U.S.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!


What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

Leave a Comment

Please enter your name.
Please enter a comment.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy