In an unexpected twist, Novartis has gotten caught up in the messy investigation into Michael Cohen, President Trump’s personal attorney.
The drug maker confirmed it entered into a previously undisclosed agreement last year with Essential Consultants, which is reportedly a shell company that Cohen used to make payments for various matters.
Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!
GET STARTEDWhat is it?
STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.
What's included?
- Daily reporting and analysis
- The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
- Subscriber-only newsletters
- Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
- STAT+ Conversations
- Weekly opportunities to engage with our reporters and leading industry experts in live video conversations
- Exclusive industry events
- Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
- The best reporters in the industry
- The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
- And much more
- Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.
About the Author Reprints
How can $20 USD make a difference to a company like Novartis? (Of course, if you have ever filled out an expense form for one of the mega-pharma’s, you know it does … but I digress.)
The exact figure mentioned for the 4 payments is fascinating – “each one totaling $99,980” – just $20 less than …..
Our scribe can be forgiven for rounding the total to $400K USD because after all, with that much money, a difference of $80 USD is ‘just a rounding error’ (Or valid by ‘the rule of 5’s’) – except, of course, that it was no error at all but absolutely intentional!
I wonder if a $100,000 expenditure would require a higher level approval or review.
Also, with Novartis, this one occurred in 2010: https://sanfordheisler.com/case/novartis-pharmaceutical-gender-discrimination-class-action/
Trump was right:
drug companies really do go away with mur …ehm … paying of porn stars!
That actually explains why Trump for once repaid his lawyer!
YOU’RE TELLING US A DRUG COMPANY PAID AN ATTORNEY FOR HIS SERVICES? I’M APALLED!
of course the $99,980 question is, what services? As far as I can tell, Cohen seems to provide a limited range of those.
Then they would have paid him directly, not a shell company for an amount brought down by $20 to avoid triggers if he was their lawyer.
April, “May” I Observe that your point is well taken?