Amid concerns that clinical trials do not adequately represent patient populations, a new analysis finds a substantial portion of so-called pivotal studies failed to break out data on the race and ethnicity of participants. And at the same time, fewer women participated in trials than might have been expected.

Over a recent 10-year period, only 37% of 775 pivotal trials – which are the late-stage studies used to win regulatory approvals – provided data on ethnicity. And only 73% of the studies broke out participation by race. However, trial sponsors did a better job of disclosing the sex and age of participants – 90% and 83%, respectively.

Unlock this article by subscribing to STAT Plus and enjoy your first 30 days free!

GET STARTED

What is it?

STAT Plus is STAT's premium subscription service for in-depth biotech, pharma, policy, and life science coverage and analysis. Our award-winning team covers news on Wall Street, policy developments in Washington, early science breakthroughs and clinical trial results, and health care disruption in Silicon Valley and beyond.

What's included?

  • Daily reporting and analysis
  • The most comprehensive industry coverage from a powerhouse team of reporters
  • Subscriber-only newsletters
  • Daily newsletters to brief you on the most important industry news of the day
  • Online intelligence briefings
  • Frequent opportunities to engage with veteran beat reporters and industry experts
  • Exclusive industry events
  • Premium access to subscriber-only networking events around the country
  • The best reporters in the industry
  • The most trusted and well-connected newsroom in the health care industry
  • And much more
  • Exclusive interviews with industry leaders, profiles, and premium tools, like our CRISPR Trackr.

A roundup of STAT’s top stories of the day in science and medicine

Privacy Policy